Re: Proposal: bi-weekly guest_memfd upstream call

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 10.10.24 19:14, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> > David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> writes:
> > 
> > > Ahoihoi,
> > > 
> > > while talking to a bunch of folks at LPC about guest_memfd, it was
> > > raised that there isn't really a place for people to discuss the
> > > development of guest_memfd on a regular basis.
> > > 
> > > There is a KVM upstream call, but guest_memfd is on its way of not being
> > > guest_memfd specific ("library") and there is the bi-weekly MM alignment
> > > call, but we're not going to hijack that meeting completely + a lot of
> > > guest_memfd stuff doesn't need all the MM experts ;)
> > > 
> > > So my proposal would be to have a bi-weekly meeting, to discuss ongoing
> > > development of guest_memfd, in particular:
> > > 
> > > (1) Organize development: (do we need 3 different implementation
> > >       of mmap() support ? ;) )
> > > (2) Discuss current progress and challenges
> > > (3) Cover future ideas and directions
> > > (4) Whatever else makes sense
> > > 
> > > Topic-wise it's relatively clear: guest_memfd extensions were one of the
> > > hot topics at LPC ;)
> > > 
> > > I would suggest every second Thursdays from 9:00 - 10:00am PDT (GMT-7),
> > > starting Thursday next week (2024-10-17).
> > 
> > This time works for me as well, thank you!
> > 
> > > 
> > > We would be using Google Meet.
> > 
> > Thanks too! Shall we use http://meet.google.com/wxp-wtju-jzw ?
> 
> I assume that room cannot be joined when you are not around (e.g., using it
> right now makes me "Ask to join"). Can that be changed?

Yeah, it can be changed.  I did it for the PUCK Meet, but I forget the exact steps :-)

> Otherwise, I think I can provide a room (Red Hat is using Google Mail/Meet
> etc.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> David / dhildenb
>