Linux Confidential Computing Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>,
	tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	seanjc@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	ardb@kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com, Michael.Roth@amd.com,
	KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com, Tycho.Andersen@amd.com,
	Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
	jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
	jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
	dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, darwi@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/sev: Only announce RMPOPT optimizations when SNP is enabled
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:24:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a66f932d-4ca2-402d-9f76-628ef53a1107@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11df35266257afcad3825a8e89c965bb0cf7cf34.1791905953.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>

On 10/13/26 10:44, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> 
> rmpopt_init() prints "RMPOPT optimizations enabled" gated only on
> X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT, which is a CPUID bit advertised independently of
> whether SNP is active.  On a system where SNP is disabled in the BIOS the
> message is still printed at boot even though RMPOPT is never actually used
> (snp_enable_rmpopt() bails out on !CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP), which is
> misleading.
> 
> rmpopt_init() is only the software setup (workqueue and the delayed work);
> the capability that matters for the message - an active SNP host - is
> checked in snp_enable_rmpopt().  Move the announcement there, as a
> pr_info_once(), so it is emitted only when RMPOPT is actually enabled on an
> SNP host.
> 
> Fixes: c6c6f156d192 ("x86/sev: Perform RMP optimizations asynchronously")
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> ---
> 
> Note: in the posted series the pr_info_once() lived in
> snp_enable_rmpopt() (SNP-gated); when applied, c6c6f156d192 moved it to
> rmpopt_init() (feature-only-gated) as a plain pr_info().  This restores the
> original placement.
>  arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index 43e4945e6cdf..6f5f4ee821d0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -656,8 +656,6 @@ static int __init rmpopt_init(void)

Should the check at the start of rmpopt_init() just be

if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP) ||
    !cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT))

so that you don't even bother setting up the workqueue, etc.?

Thanks,
Tom

>  	if ((rmpopt_pa_end - rmpopt_pa_start) > SZ_2T)
>  		rmpopt_pa_end = rmpopt_pa_start + SZ_2T;
>  
> -	pr_info("RMPOPT optimizations enabled\n");
> -
>  	rmpopt_soft_init = true;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -690,6 +688,8 @@ void snp_enable_rmpopt(void)
>  
>  	mod_delayed_work(rmpopt_wq, &rmpopt_delayed_work,
>  			 msecs_to_jiffies(RMPOPT_WORK_TIMEOUT));
> +
> +	pr_info_once("RMPOPT optimizations enabled\n");
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_enable_rmpopt, "ccp,kvm-amd");
>  


      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 15:44 [PATCH 0/2] x86/sev: Fix RMPOPT enablement on non-RMPOPT configs Ashish Kalra
2026-10-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/sev: Clear RMPOPT when segmented RMP is disabled by firmware Ashish Kalra
2026-10-13 22:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-10-13 23:24     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-10-14 13:21   ` Tom Lendacky
2026-10-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/sev: Only announce RMPOPT optimizations when SNP is enabled Ashish Kalra
2026-10-14 13:24   ` Tom Lendacky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a66f932d-4ca2-402d-9f76-628ef53a1107@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=Ashish.Kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=KPrateek.Nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
    --cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jackyli@google.com \
    --cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox