From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kas@kernel.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: TDX: Replace kmalloc + copy_from_user with memdup_user in tdx_td_init
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 15:15:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO16HySFc6wNVpix@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916213129.2535597-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Use get_user() to retrieve the number of entries instead of allocating
> memory for 'init_vm' with the maximum size, copying 'cmd->data' to it,
> only to then read the actual entry count 'cpuid.nent' from the copy.
>
> Return -E2BIG early if 'nr_user_entries' exceeds KVM_MAX_CPUID_ENTRIES.
I think I'll drop this line from the changelog. At first glance I thought you
were calling out a change in behavior, and my hackles went up. :-)
> Use memdup_user() to allocate just enough memory to fit all entries and
> to copy 'cmd->data' from userspace. Use struct_size() instead of
> manually calculating the number of bytes to allocate and copy.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
> Compile-tested only.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 32 ++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index 66744f5768c8..87510541d2a2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -2742,8 +2742,10 @@ static int tdx_read_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 leaf, u32 sub_leaf,
> static int tdx_td_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_tdx_cmd *cmd)
> {
> struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(kvm);
> + struct kvm_tdx_init_vm __user *user_init_vm;
Any objection to calling this user_data instead of user_init_vm? I keep reading
user_init_vm as a flag or command, e.g. "user initialized VM" or something, not
as a pointer to user data.
No need for a v2, I'll fixup to whatever we settle on (assuming no one jumps in
with a crazy idea).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-13 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 21:31 [PATCH] KVM: TDX: Replace kmalloc + copy_from_user with memdup_user in tdx_td_init Thorsten Blum
2025-10-13 22:15 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-10-14 11:16 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-10-15 18:02 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aO16HySFc6wNVpix@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox