From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan J Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
"xin@zytor.com" <xin@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/tdx: Do VMXON and TDX-Module initialization during tdx_init()
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 16:35:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO4LVTvnsvt/UA+4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aO1oKWbjeswQ-wZO@google.com>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 01:59:21PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 13, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote:
>> On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 15:04 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> > @@ -3524,34 +3453,31 @@ static int __init __tdx_bringup(void)
>> > if (td_conf->max_vcpus_per_td < num_present_cpus()) {
>> > pr_err("Disable TDX: MAX_VCPU_PER_TD (%u) smaller than number of logical CPUs (%u).\n",
>> > td_conf->max_vcpus_per_td, num_present_cpus());
>> > - goto get_sysinfo_err;
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > if (misc_cg_set_capacity(MISC_CG_RES_TDX, tdx_get_nr_guest_keyids()))
>> > - goto get_sysinfo_err;
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > /*
>> > - * Leave hardware virtualization enabled after TDX is enabled
>> > - * successfully. TDX CPU hotplug depends on this.
>> > + * TDX-specific cpuhp callback to disallow offlining the last CPU in a
>> > + * packing while KVM is running one or more TDs. Reclaiming HKIDs
>> > + * requires doing PAGE.WBINVD on every package, i.e. offlining all CPUs
>> > + * of a package would prevent reclaiming the HKID.
>> > */
>> > + r = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "kvm/cpu/tdx:online",
>> > + tdx_online_cpu, tdx_offline_cpu);
>>
>> Could pass NULL instead of tdx_online_cpu() and delete this version of
>> tdx_online_cpu().
>
>Oh, nice, I didn't realize (or forgot) the startup call is optional.
>
>> Also could remove the error handling too.
>
>No. Partly on prinicple, but also because CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN can fail if the
>kernel runs out of dynamic entries (currently limited to 40). The kernel WARNs
>if it runs out of entries, but KVM should still do the right thing.
>
>> Also, can we name the two tdx_offline_cpu()'s differently? This one is all about
>> keyid's being in use. tdx_hkid_offline_cpu()?
>
>Ya. And change the description to "kvm/cpu/tdx:hkid_packages"? Or something
>like that.
>
Is it a good idea to consolidate the two tdx_offline_cpu() functions, i.e.,
integrate KVM's version into x86 core?
From 97165f9933f48d588f5390e2d543d9880c03532d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 01:00:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86/virt/tdx: Consolidate TDX CPU hotplug handling
The core kernel registers a CPU hotplug callback to do VMX and TDX init
and deinit while KVM registers a separate CPU offline callback to block
offlining the last online CPU in a socket.
Splitting TDX-related CPU hotplug handling across two components is odd
and adds unnecessary complexity.
Consolidate TDX-related CPU hotplug handling by integrating KVM's
tdx_offline_cpu() to the one in the core kernel.
Also move nr_configured_hkid to the core kernel because tdx_offline_cpu()
references it. Since HKID allocation and free are handled in the core
kernel, it's more natural to track used HKIDs there.
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 67 +------------------------------------
arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index d89382971076..beac8ab4cbc1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@ module_param_named(tdx, enable_tdx, bool, 0444);
#define TDX_SHARED_BIT_PWL_5 gpa_to_gfn(BIT_ULL(51))
#define TDX_SHARED_BIT_PWL_4 gpa_to_gfn(BIT_ULL(47))
-static enum cpuhp_state tdx_cpuhp_state __ro_after_init;
-
static const struct tdx_sys_info *tdx_sysinfo;
void tdh_vp_rd_failed(struct vcpu_tdx *tdx, char *uclass, u32 field, u64 err)
@@ -206,8 +204,6 @@ static int init_kvm_tdx_caps(const struct tdx_sys_info_td_conf *td_conf,
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(tdx_lock);
-static atomic_t nr_configured_hkid;
-
static bool tdx_operand_busy(u64 err)
{
return (err & TDX_SEAMCALL_STATUS_MASK) == TDX_OPERAND_BUSY;
@@ -255,7 +251,6 @@ static inline void tdx_hkid_free(struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx)
{
tdx_guest_keyid_free(kvm_tdx->hkid);
kvm_tdx->hkid = -1;
- atomic_dec(&nr_configured_hkid);
misc_cg_uncharge(MISC_CG_RES_TDX, kvm_tdx->misc_cg, 1);
put_misc_cg(kvm_tdx->misc_cg);
kvm_tdx->misc_cg = NULL;
@@ -2487,8 +2482,6 @@ static int __tdx_td_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct td_params *td_params,
ret = -ENOMEM;
- atomic_inc(&nr_configured_hkid);
-
tdr_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tdr_page)
goto free_hkid;
@@ -3343,51 +3336,10 @@ int tdx_gmem_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, bool is_private)
return PG_LEVEL_4K;
}
-static int tdx_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int tdx_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- int i;
-
- /* No TD is running. Allow any cpu to be offline. */
- if (!atomic_read(&nr_configured_hkid))
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * In order to reclaim TDX HKID, (i.e. when deleting guest TD), need to
- * call TDH.PHYMEM.PAGE.WBINVD on all packages to program all memory
- * controller with pconfig. If we have active TDX HKID, refuse to
- * offline the last online cpu.
- */
- for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- /*
- * Found another online cpu on the same package.
- * Allow to offline.
- */
- if (i != cpu && topology_physical_package_id(i) ==
- topology_physical_package_id(cpu))
- return 0;
- }
-
- /*
- * This is the last cpu of this package. Don't offline it.
- *
- * Because it's hard for human operator to understand the
- * reason, warn it.
- */
-#define MSG_ALLPKG_ONLINE \
- "TDX requires all packages to have an online CPU. Delete all TDs in order to offline all CPUs of a package.\n"
- pr_warn_ratelimited(MSG_ALLPKG_ONLINE);
- return -EBUSY;
-}
-
static int __init __tdx_bringup(void)
{
const struct tdx_sys_info_td_conf *td_conf;
- int r, i;
+ int i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tdx_uret_msrs); i++) {
/*
@@ -3459,23 +3411,7 @@ static int __init __tdx_bringup(void)
if (misc_cg_set_capacity(MISC_CG_RES_TDX, tdx_get_nr_guest_keyids()))
return -EINVAL;
- /*
- * TDX-specific cpuhp callback to disallow offlining the last CPU in a
- * packing while KVM is running one or more TDs. Reclaiming HKIDs
- * requires doing PAGE.WBINVD on every package, i.e. offlining all CPUs
- * of a package would prevent reclaiming the HKID.
- */
- r = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "kvm/cpu/tdx:online",
- tdx_online_cpu, tdx_offline_cpu);
- if (r < 0)
- goto err_cpuhup;
-
- tdx_cpuhp_state = r;
return 0;
-
-err_cpuhup:
- misc_cg_set_capacity(MISC_CG_RES_TDX, 0);
- return r;
}
int __init tdx_bringup(void)
@@ -3531,7 +3467,6 @@ void tdx_cleanup(void)
return;
misc_cg_set_capacity(MISC_CG_RES_TDX, 0);
- cpuhp_remove_state(tdx_cpuhp_state);
}
void __init tdx_hardware_setup(void)
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
index bf1c1cdd9690..201ecb4ad20d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(tdx_memlist);
static struct tdx_sys_info tdx_sysinfo __ro_after_init;
static bool tdx_module_initialized __ro_after_init;
+static atomic_t nr_configured_hkid;
+
typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args);
static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args)
@@ -190,6 +192,40 @@ static int tdx_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
static int tdx_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ int i;
+
+ /* No TD is running. Allow any cpu to be offline. */
+ if (!atomic_read(&nr_configured_hkid))
+ goto done;
+
+ /*
+ * In order to reclaim TDX HKID, (i.e. when deleting guest TD), need to
+ * call TDH.PHYMEM.PAGE.WBINVD on all packages to program all memory
+ * controller with pconfig. If we have active TDX HKID, refuse to
+ * offline the last online cpu.
+ */
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+ /*
+ * Found another online cpu on the same package.
+ * Allow to offline.
+ */
+ if (i != cpu && topology_physical_package_id(i) ==
+ topology_physical_package_id(cpu))
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This is the last cpu of this package. Don't offline it.
+ *
+ * Because it's hard for human operator to understand the
+ * reason, warn it.
+ */
+#define MSG_ALLPKG_ONLINE \
+ "TDX requires all packages to have an online CPU. Delete all TDs in order to offline all CPUs of a package.\n"
+ pr_warn_ratelimited(MSG_ALLPKG_ONLINE);
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+done:
x86_virt_put_cpu(X86_FEATURE_VMX);
return 0;
}
@@ -1505,15 +1541,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_get_nr_guest_keyids);
int tdx_guest_keyid_alloc(void)
{
- return ida_alloc_range(&tdx_guest_keyid_pool, tdx_guest_keyid_start,
- tdx_guest_keyid_start + tdx_nr_guest_keyids - 1,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = ida_alloc_range(&tdx_guest_keyid_pool, tdx_guest_keyid_start,
+ tdx_guest_keyid_start + tdx_nr_guest_keyids - 1,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ atomic_inc(&nr_configured_hkid);
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_guest_keyid_alloc);
void tdx_guest_keyid_free(unsigned int keyid)
{
ida_free(&tdx_guest_keyid_pool, keyid);
+ atomic_dec(&nr_configured_hkid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_guest_keyid_free);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 22:03 [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/tdx: Have TDX handle VMXON during bringup Sean Christopherson
2025-10-10 22:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Move kvm_rebooting to x86 Sean Christopherson
2025-10-10 22:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Extract VMXON and EFER.SVME enablement to kernel Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 13:20 ` Chao Gao
2025-10-13 17:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 22:08 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-13 23:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-17 8:47 ` Chao Gao
2025-10-17 17:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-10 22:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/tdx: Do VMXON and TDX-Module initialization during tdx_init() Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 12:49 ` Chao Gao
2025-10-13 14:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 19:31 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-13 20:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-14 8:35 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2025-10-14 18:51 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-14 19:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-14 19:44 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-10 22:04 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: Bury kvm_{en,dis}able_virtualization() in kvm_main.c once more Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 22:22 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/tdx: Have TDX handle VMXON during bringup dan.j.williams
2025-10-13 23:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-14 0:18 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-14 2:13 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aO4LVTvnsvt/UA+4@intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).