From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
xin@zytor.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 22/27] coco/tdx-host: Implement SPDM session setup
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:35:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQxPqjCUAMYwTvkI@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030113622.00001e2b@huawei.com>
> > +struct spdm_config_info_t {
> > + u32 vmm_spdm_cap;
> > +#define SPDM_CAP_HBEAT BIT(13)
> > +#define SPDM_CAP_KEY_UPD BIT(14)
> > + u8 spdm_session_policy;
> > + u8 certificate_slot_mask;
> > + u8 raw_bitstream_requested;
> > + u8 reserved[];
> Given the only use in here that I can immediately spot is on the
> stack with nothing in reserved (so zero size) + you then memcpy that into
> another buffer, why bother having reserved in this declaration?
I'll delete the reserved.
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > static struct pci_tsm_ops tdx_link_ops;
> >
> > static struct pci_tsm *tdx_link_pf0_probe(struct tsm_dev *tsm_dev,
> > struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > {
> > + const struct spdm_config_info_t spdm_config_info = {
> > + /* use a default configuration, may require user input later */
> > + .vmm_spdm_cap = SPDM_CAP_KEY_UPD,
> > + .certificate_slot_mask = 0xff,
> > + };
> > int rc;
> >
> > struct tdx_link *tlink __free(kfree) =
> > @@ -176,6 +423,29 @@ static struct pci_tsm *tdx_link_pf0_probe(struct tsm_dev *tsm_dev,
> > if (rc)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + tlink->func_id = tdisp_func_id(pdev);
> > +
> > + struct page *in_msg_page __free(__free_page) =
> > + alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > + if (!in_msg_page)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + struct page *out_msg_page __free(__free_page) =
> > + alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > + if (!out_msg_page)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + struct page *spdm_conf __free(__free_page) =
> > + alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > + if (!spdm_conf)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + memcpy(page_address(spdm_conf), &spdm_config_info, sizeof(spdm_config_info));
> > +
> > + tlink->in_msg = no_free_ptr(in_msg_page);
> > + tlink->out_msg = no_free_ptr(out_msg_page);
> > + tlink->spdm_conf = no_free_ptr(spdm_conf);
> > +
> > return &no_free_ptr(tlink)->pci.base_tsm;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -183,6 +453,9 @@ static void tdx_link_pf0_remove(struct pci_tsm *tsm)
> > {
> > struct tdx_link *tlink = to_tdx_link(tsm);
> >
> > + __free_page(tlink->in_msg);
> > + __free_page(tlink->out_msg);
> > + __free_page(tlink->spdm_conf);
> Trivial but I'd prefer to see these freed in reverse order of allocation
> of where they are set. Just makes reviewing a tiny bit easier as the code
> evolves.
Will do.
>
> > pci_tsm_pf0_destructor(&tlink->pci);
> > kfree(tlink);
> > }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 14:22 [RFC PATCH 00/27] PCI/TSM: TDX Connect: SPDM Session and IDE Establishment Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 01/27] coco/tdx-host: Introduce a "tdx_host" device Dan Williams
2025-10-30 10:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03 23:01 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 02/27] x86/virt/tdx: Move bit definitions of TDX_FEATURES0 to public header Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 03/27] coco/tdx-host: Support Link TSM for TDX host Dan Williams
2025-10-30 10:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03 23:04 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 04/27] x86/virt/tdx: Move tdx_errno.h from KVM to public place Dan Williams
2025-09-22 11:47 ` Huang, Kai
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 05/27] x86/virt/tdx: Add tdx_page_array helpers for new TDX Module objects Dan Williams
2025-10-30 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03 23:17 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 06/27] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for TDH.EXT.MEM.ADD and TDH.EXT.INIT Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 07/27] TODO: x86/virt/tdx: Read TDX global metadata for TDX Module Extensions Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 08/27] x86/virt/tdx: Add tdx_enable_ext() to enable of " Dan Williams
2025-10-30 10:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-05 9:14 ` Xu Yilun
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 09/27] ACPICA: Add KEYP table definitions Dan Williams
2025-10-06 14:41 ` Samuel Ortiz
2025-10-10 7:35 ` Xu Yilun
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 10/27] acpi: Add KEYP support to fw_table parsing Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 11/27] acpi: Add KEYP Key Configuration Unit parsing Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-05 10:18 ` Xu Yilun
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 12/27] iommu/vt-d: Cache max domain ID to avoid redundant calculation Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 13/27] iommu/vt-d: Reserve the MSB domain ID bit for the TDX module Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 14/27] TODO: x86/virt/tdx: Read TDX Connect global metadata for TDX Connect Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 15/27] x86/virt/tdx: Extend tdx_page_array to support IOMMU_MT Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 16/27] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for trusted IOMMU setup and clear Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 17/27] iommu/vt-d: Export a helper to do function for each dmar_drhd_unit Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 18/27] coco/tdx-host: Setup all trusted IOMMUs on TDX Connect init Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 19/27] coco/tdx-host: Add a helper to exchange SPDM messages through DOE Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 20/27] coco/tdx-host: Add connect()/disconnect() handlers prototype Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03 23:34 ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-06 5:18 ` Xu Yilun
2025-11-10 11:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-11 0:51 ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-13 2:51 ` Xu Yilun
2025-11-14 20:19 ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-17 4:56 ` Xu Yilun
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 21/27] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for SPDM management Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03 23:38 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 22/27] coco/tdx-host: Implement SPDM session setup Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-06 7:35 ` Xu Yilun [this message]
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 23/27] PCI: iov: Export pci_iov_virtfn_bus() Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 24/27] PCI/IDE: Add helpers for RID/Addr Association Registers setup Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 25/27] PCI/IDE: Export pci_ide_domain() Dan Williams
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 26/27] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for IDE stream management Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 14:22 ` [RFC PATCH 27/27] coco/tdx-host: Implement IDE stream setup/teardown Dan Williams
2025-10-30 11:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-04 0:13 ` dan.j.williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQxPqjCUAMYwTvkI@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050 \
--to=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox