From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D196D2E6116; Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767886341; cv=none; b=ur7ySnRk0iXe/GNhjEgZDJci6kN9zNS2batkRWlX8SQxjuaEXqbhNbcb+Wwo0Yh2QlQVOs2vxK3I2xlMzH2cidcGIsyWPJ4DlJErm27qFw5caz/T53QrvJ6Hi9udINOR83mjC455k6mf3bs2c7VIy+6I/c6XEL53ErVXazsljxk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767886341; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nODPnQ9uRMurJcexhU0AkEFsKCop/ncB8cW0GYwEwHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QXhHg4B0e1z0M4EZGW/OPRmrAAxYolQI0QjYOJPBcRI6bmz249AsYCH2d/TZEeaPD/BPeJac7mM3YVuMSH7laqQ5WYfAqsT8KAqhjQ1stNcQq8WL15ZpShitMo5UUtmj6JH2lGdDn4IzmY+De6/KWbJfzrEazBoiiCoYGeRpVfc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ffig8Frt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ffig8Frt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D057AC116C6; Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:32:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767886341; bh=nODPnQ9uRMurJcexhU0AkEFsKCop/ncB8cW0GYwEwHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ffig8FrtQznSyAHcwxDugdT799R16YhmH6Y1dJHqu9KFu2/aJDz6dSDfAN/2InyPX 54sZZECfTWY2QxQmI3u+iKdORZhQfwEtY5eu+eImGUOsqTLIU8huzIuq6dUiiel55Y fO/mZpgbS5Fu7KLtq86stVp98Yc1etYFAzeDPpOEtCIdZ5EP8AuM5TNxUdErwu64cb JiDsH14OeUNeqapepA0tyGsC2U2LIB79020LZiulptJmhZ7u9j9GNssswa8/jf1xja 9yDJniEPezNZFT1gsQd9+OuUyNjGrVBetpogN1L3yY5RMDiabjtGQ3cyUEXeGYejRE SaljBtPHaUNfg== Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:32:14 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, aik@amd.com, lukas@wunner.de, Samuel Ortiz , Xu Yilun , Jason Gunthorpe , Suzuki K Poulose , Steven Price , Bjorn Helgaas , Jonathan Cameron , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] coco: guest: arm64: Add support for guest initiated TDI bind/unbind Message-ID: References: <20251117140007.122062-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> <20251117140007.122062-4-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251117140007.122062-4-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 07:29:59PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: > Add RHI for VDEV_SET_TDI_STATE > > Note: This is not part of RHI spec. This is a POC implementation > and will be later converted to correct interface defined by RHI. Then maybe send this as an RFC given that it doesn't sound like something we should be merging? Will