From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f202.google.com (mail-pg1-f202.google.com [209.85.215.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1C32652A2 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.202 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782914002; cv=none; b=PTIowC6XFXmfwJSuF7k34gJTpdwe9/wOqVT7kQpryt0SM2i/LEU1eNIi+FsN8fD/PMhtBzMooOpyFQ+5KkGwmBpxiRaUJbnMToglrNHPa7SVxwZc0/XxoObx2/qb4DfcI5Td9aY0IKh1w4aM49xSQmy7fqWihEVIzvlc2kOfYHk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782914002; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k6UrRFYCyc5Lzmrh2nnW7+82Ut94TI2p/klH6GO/JIw=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=jvWfz/sZYX929B70Uw9o3Ff+TVQ//5Zs6i/dtqDFcsTnPO8dYz51Yd+/JzioKIx6kTlpIqwzjYTrt2xEWH7CGGhQ7FO8Ang61ErQsSXWxl83XwmgCtzhFxLCtiA+HDnAIA7AMzGfL9IsfmR/kR+97XEs4siOHlrJCvrWnHfCSYY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=hpBBKHpp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="hpBBKHpp" Received: by mail-pg1-f202.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-c889d1eebafso958805a12.0 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2026 06:53:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1782914001; x=1783518801; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2dlvRC/ivhzraYV58bWG4aEWroXr163d0LU1VPS4Meg=; b=hpBBKHppfJ1nrJ17u7LpJE8QF2gu8XQt25W6sOlda1+fyrGwwxmXi/fSKdy/hB2rlN hM5YYeNJ0gwUn6jFe+BFO5XX0376tUqQvGmau0zuse25uaTiIKLeSxM/zvsNawd3amvq ik5HZs4BrSU9+1NETHOWm1tUGQ/zIBTkk/voVpP96uyE6Yt8TyFT7kml/6/A3H0+iDo1 6XjO2bik+Yq2oKuRN6x/CRHpcHkE4fcxKF2us282wJBRB73LyExIO5RCApKSebAxEq25 uFzNUdvEm+S1W3x6QqJTImsbhxe7q9R06mG8y1ZvDs8jv+8ZAuWkuIQvObrqathTpj3N ow7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1782914001; x=1783518801; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2dlvRC/ivhzraYV58bWG4aEWroXr163d0LU1VPS4Meg=; b=eqGFJDq5+S25Koaa4wcZvUaZzRkmGc2A/kTHZi0HprJHoHE3Ng81reFkCfkZxt66EA JpVo8CVCB2Yw4SO6mFMLOtyxraBrjHIQ8CIjIi6/MstTPGga/EDQCjVFydezlETG+Mvq dgsgnFVjtbDzifb04WLVxv8YdLrZhyU5fW8y26eEhrtPP29CqW+z90y/dS9d//DooqXv L2llaybFkvII3Witkt+/MEtK7q3qfaEqodkvj9eyCGuVOgUnmU67Bqs9SbC9OfICVq0B 272RerYkLZKCNtfNidBPpU1UJPwDO0J7jGtQll0CNozfj2r5DPl1VMmuGzCakYqkSp1z plBw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9YjD5hfptYNHB1+LI62k9Hux+Rv6G0T8urJuV9OTpADebk7x/30vWYI2Qb/r4GHmNBsGuqjXhgl7Lg@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxH4uWQM3PPN/S6l6va4/PX8Jcd3UTnDvjPgDKWfFoThS6n42sa oTsphEpc/f1PDgq934/XqmuVMG3h2oLP+97je2UtAfLFWrcViISYhmXxFBEy4fIfeGZTnJ/+bJy nY5TLww== X-Received: from pgam26.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6a02:2b5a:b0:c99:aff5:707d]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a20:6a11:b0:3bf:acb2:5d48 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-3bff4227b8fmr926021637.38.1782914000204; Wed, 01 Jul 2026 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 06:53:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <25fdb77d-20f6-4b3a-8b3a-dbba0dc47046@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20260618-gmem-inplace-conversion-v8-24-9d2959357853@google.com> <25fdb77d-20f6-4b3a-8b3a-dbba0dc47046@intel.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 24/46] KVM: guest_memfd: Make in-place conversion the default\ From: Sean Christopherson To: Xiaoyao Li Cc: Yan Zhao , Ackerley Tng , aik@amd.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, brauner@kernel.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, david@kernel.org, jmattson@google.com, jthoughton@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com, oupton@kernel.org, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, qperret@google.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, shivankg@amd.com, steven.price@arm.com, tabba@google.com, willy@infradead.org, wyihan@google.com, forkloop@google.com, pratyush@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Vishal Annapurve , Andrew Morton , Chris Li , Kairui Song , Kemeng Shi , Nhat Pham , Barry Song , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Youngjun Park , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , Kiryl Shutsemau , Baoquan He , Jason Gunthorpe , Vlastimil Babka , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wed, Jul 01, 2026, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > On 6/27/2026 3:06 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2026, Yan Zhao wrote: > > > My first impression of gmem_in_place_conversion=true was that it enforces gmem > > > in-place conversion. However, it actually only enforces per-gmem private/shared > > > attribute. > > > My worry was that people might think it's a kernel bug if userspace can still > > > have shared memory from other sources after they configured > > > gmem_in_place_conversion=true. > > Ah, I see where you're coming from. FWIW, truly enforcing in-place conversion > > is flat out impossible. E.g. userspace can simply replace the memslot, at which > > point the memory effectively reverts to shared. > > would something like below enforce the in-place conversion? No. > Userspace can create a memslot without gmem fd, but that memslot can only > serve as shared memory and cannot be converted. So it doesn't violate the > in-place conversion. But userspace can delete said memslot and replace it with a memslot pointing at a guest_memfd instance that was created without INIT_SHARED, at which point userspace has effected a shared=>private conversion.