From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f69.google.com (mail-pj1-f69.google.com [209.85.216.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99D7486E4D for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.69 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786636524; cv=none; b=WZwVqEBV7bp/Yh2CZJ83uNd0WcVUb/55EENLz3jcsbTtVwn/hHZ3UiIAag5Kz9p2bykPY8hNMDojVNPERf1e4jPmRRhNj0cZFrPtB18/mgU4Nlip3fPslc5DWtJ/oa8pXfv1VMIXWbbSBE+NKtFwh0jguMnfPvFncZhtWQYnKbQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786636524; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KjvD0FYtibQe8DPB7+KaUJitoRzCPmTVRI1ZUYReScM=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=nezSsXToLGhSt258PalT3xtfqXOrLkXMW85/hKUXsiHLWzItkhqUpNEQFJfLm3DTYmyazX8SNkmA8nUrbPLefdHdTNcv8iMXJJu1xKtJ75GpNNZ5OX8iklXZZV7rYPylvicV8PtLONaYDB/ihRHbrfft1BdA1+X3kggoqULetTg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=Gkx4Wopm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.69 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Gkx4Wopm" Received: by mail-pj1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-38dc085b0a7so1663039a91.2 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:55:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1786636515; x=1787241315; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=NWd+efJbNRhMQi4tFuFF6oho5IzekPVE1UiVHSpD6zk=; b=Gkx4WopmrxWQByFJUb9iPph6z2ikin5qxwL0bRgmTk7cQLkh3ENUoTOv0rqlTmCaNG 4JzNKVMj8NA8Unu2nKHF8QZ9cUOxe7lnC7wVuSgxclLPSIUqWkeA4ukroeOl2QVfZ0wr kknkdB2S3fSG4LT3QZwyZ2fuJI/AZKPWCKEwL35IczhqIppFtscj/L7CtN3rzhRF4dNs 66WmT2nbWgF1CCpEYAPmusPtFGacjlI/maZb6/A/Gci9UDYuEu/GK2Tmnj6H370XeiYQ q5nNcGEIzBjEW2h8eKRAeb1pnw7PJEfPzho1nh11EZhR3kp6QpBxVTuSYGgr18n4yBg1 ij/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1786636515; x=1787241315; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=NWd+efJbNRhMQi4tFuFF6oho5IzekPVE1UiVHSpD6zk=; b=CR2Rz1r8bDz881mXfsNFmPa2OBzTyPFZGUKkNlk1xenfKgnBoT2zljmCz0IhIsdI6Q 4sALUgMVwDYuJDg5uClK0/xtfZQ0xAOrwK8wkJ8fLMFRff+c/Wld/0rrWkPbUfluv6lu mCV8o817mXFNLODmai5I6maGEPrS09g5VtNMH2DRFt9uUc19OQyfNo5bdH/jxzroeSek 2Dg//0sUhwyuM4qS8Hmppt1LmHbbT+BWN58uX5a5qbxZYpc8gdOi6IqNgGxcsKFZvP0m EFSIVqZ57grT7dAOlNiXKPIekVq1XCPR2sbXA4ctu2qDtKPY05ojFjKAlbi1ot3Tlv4M 6HNg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rq9tXOxgytmys5S5q+uhfjuL2ipUbdJyEDK5uW5Zg/Qw9sYKOAw6B0RA1ZcchYGyupYHhWJ/R50qZBM@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzLx5sputGL05r2ZdzPnSj2YjAsVOTJuJWzO9GnwoiD5l7712Bh t6j0eg6pJNmJsv4F/LF9ctYzaLSOEJSr3ZpHbDVW2lFJZOjgHVdT2VJurMRtisR0JY29lZruG2N 1aGZ04Q== X-Received: from pjbmr22.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90b:2396:b0:381:1d7f:b8db]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:90b:4a8d:b0:36a:8240:2477 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3931e31a6f4mr7349226a91.19.1786636514937; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:55:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1ec08cd8-3072-4753-ad5e-cd34956647f8@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20260807-gmem-inplace-conversion-v10-0-2fc18ee6d3ba@google.com> <20260807-gmem-inplace-conversion-v10-12-2fc18ee6d3ba@google.com> <1ec08cd8-3072-4753-ad5e-cd34956647f8@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 12/41] KVM: guest_memfd: Call arch make_shared callback for to-shared conversion From: Sean Christopherson To: Binbin Wu Cc: ackerleytng@google.com, aik@amd.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, brauner@kernel.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, david@kernel.org, jmattson@google.com, jthoughton@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com, oupton@kernel.org, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, qperret@google.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, shivankg@amd.com, steven.price@arm.com, tabba@google.com, willy@infradead.org, wyihan@google.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, forkloop@google.com, pratyush@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Vishal Annapurve , Andrew Morton , Chris Li , Kairui Song , Kemeng Shi , Nhat Pham , Barry Song , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Youngjun Park , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , Kiryl Shutsemau , Baoquan He , Jason Gunthorpe , John Hubbard , Peter Xu , tarunsahu@google.com, Vlastimil Babka , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, Fuad Tabba Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 13, 2026, Binbin Wu wrote: > On 8/8/2026 5:52 AM, Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT > > +static void kvm_gmem_make_shared(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t start, p= goff_t end) > > +{ > > + struct folio_batch fbatch; > > + pgoff_t next =3D start; > > + int i; > > + > > + folio_batch_init(&fbatch); > > + while (filemap_get_folios(inode->i_mapping, &next, end - 1, &fbatch))= { > > + for (i =3D 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); ++i) { > > + struct folio *folio =3D fbatch.folios[i]; > > + pgoff_t start_index, end_index; > > + kvm_pfn_t start_pfn; > > + kvm_pfn_t nr_pages; > > + > > + start_index =3D max(start, folio->index); > > + end_index =3D min(end, folio_next_index(folio)); > > + /* > > + * end_index is either in folio or points to > > + * the first page of the next folio. Hence, > > + * all pages in range [start_index, end_index) > > + * are contiguous. > > + */ > > + start_pfn =3D folio_file_pfn(folio, start_index); > > + nr_pages =3D end_index - start_index; > > + > > + kvm_arch_gmem_make_shared(start_pfn, nr_pages); > > + } > > + > > + folio_batch_release(&fbatch); > > + cond_resched(); > > + } > > +} > > +#else > > +static void kvm_gmem_make_shared(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t start, p= goff_t end) {} > > +#endif > > + > > static int __kvm_gmem_set_attributes(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t star= t, > > size_t nr_pages, uint64_t attrs, > > pgoff_t *err_index) > > @@ -599,7 +636,12 @@ static int __kvm_gmem_set_attributes(struct inode = *inode, pgoff_t start, > > =20 > > filter =3D to_private ? KVM_FILTER_SHARED : KVM_FILTER_PRIVATE; > > kvm_gmem_invalidate_start(inode, start, end, filter); > > + > > + if (!to_private) > > + kvm_gmem_make_shared(inode, start, end); >=20 > If both KVM_AMD_SEV and KVM_INTEL_TDX are enabled, HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CON= VERT > will be enabled and the logic in kvm_gmem_make_shared() introduces unnece= ssary > overhead for TDX. > Not sure about CSPs, but in a standard distribution kernel, it's very lik= ely > that both are enabled, right=EF=BC=9F Yep. > Should kvm_gmem_make_shared() do some optimization or the overhead is rel= ative > small in the conversion to shared path so that the optimization is not wo= rth it? I assume it's relatively small, but it's probably a good idea to gets numbe= rs so that we can make a semi-informed decision. E.g. if processing 1GiB work of= 4KiB folios is <100 cycles, I think we generally don't care. But if it's more l= ike tens of microseconds, then I think we do care enough to optimize the walkin= g for TDX.