From: Kohei Enju <enju.kohei@fujitsu.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steven.price@arm.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, gshan@redhat.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, tabba@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com,
sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com,
fj0570is@fujitsu.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 0/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add RMM v2.0 base RMI support
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 13:09:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ap-C6NLnxuWWTMzi@FCCLS0092175.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907095942.1140734-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Hi Suzuki,
On 09/07 10:59, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> This series adds the generic firmware layer for talking to the Realm
> Management Monitor (RMM), as specified by the RMM v2.0-bet3
> specification[1]. It is the first part of the Arm CCA host support that
> was previously posted as part of the larger KVM series.
>
> The split allows this RMM support to be used as a base for other work,
> including Aneesh's PCI IDE support with Arm CCA RMM as the TSM,
> without depending on the KVM Realm support that will follow as separate
> series. (See more on that below)
>
> The series adds:
>
> * The RMI SMC definitions and direct-call wrappers.
>
> * RMM discovery and version checks during firmware init.
>
> * RMM host configuration, including the host page size.
>
> * Stateful RMI Operation (SRO) infrastructure for commands which the RMM
> can complete across multiple SMC calls while requesting or returning
> memory to the host.
>
> * Verification that granule tracking is available at fine granularity.
> Fine-grained tracking allows each granule in the system to be tracked
> independently, which is required before individual granules can be
> delegated. A future series will add support for dynamically supplying
> memory to the RMM for this tracking.
>
> * Support for fully firmware-managed systems, where the Granule Protection
> Tables for memory regions are allocated and managed by firmware. RMM v2.0
> also allows dynamic GPT creation on demand; support for that will be added
> in a later series.
>
> * Wrappers for the RMI commands that are used for managing the "Realm VM"
> lifecycle. This is added in to make it easier for the on-going KVM support
> to evolve in parallel pieces.
>
> If the platform firmware cannot manage the granule tracking or the GPTs, we
> bail out and deactivate the RMM, reclaiming any memory that we have donated.
>
> The RMM v2.0 spec introduces Stateful RMI Operations (SROs), which allow
> the RMM to complete an operation over several SMC calls while requesting
> or returning memory to the host. This allows interrupts to be handled in
> the middle of an operation and lets the RMM dynamically allocate memory
> for internal tracking purposes. For example, RMI_REC_CREATE no longer
> needs auxiliary granules to be provided up front, and can instead
> request memory during the operation.
>
> This series applies on v7.3-rc1 and a branch is available at [2]. The KVM
> CCA support that builds on this series is available at [3] as an integration
> branch. The KVM support depends on guest-memfd-in-place conversion support v12
> from Ackerley [4], we plan to split that into parts, which apply cleanly on
> v7.3-rcx without any dependency and is in progress. This will be made available
> as soon as it is ready. Until then [3] shows how this base series enables KVM
> CCA support. You may find the tf-RMM [5] and kvmtool support [6] below.
>
> [1] RMM spec : https://support.arm.com/documentation/den0137/2-0bet3/
> [2] This series: https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-cca.git cca/cca-host/fw_rmm/v17
> [3] KVM CCA v17 integration branch: https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-cca.git cca/cca-host/kvm-integration/v17
> [4] Gmem inplace conversion https://github.com/googleprodkernel/linux-cc/tree/guest_memfd-inplace-conversion-v12
> [5] TF-RMM https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-RMM/tf-rmm.git main (commit: 134266ae)
I understand that QEMU-virt is not intended to model a realistic
production platform and that QEMU-SBSA is generally preferred. However,
I sometimes use QEMU-virt to test functionality quickly because it runs
slightly faster than QEMU-SBSA.
I tested this series with QEMU-virt and found that RMM initialization
failed during boot:
[...]
INFO: BL31: Initializing RMM
INFO: RMM init start.
ERROR: RMM init failed: -8
WARNING: BL31: RMM initialization failed
The following TF-A revision was used:
https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git master (38269bb)
After investigating, I found that the failure was caused by the lack of
a plat_rmmd_reserve_memory() implementation for the QEMU-virt platform
in TF-A. Adding an implementation equivalent to the QEMU-SBSA one
resolved the issue:
https://git.trustedfirmware.org/plugins/gitiles/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/+/9d594743aa4d4e8160cdf025ea7538041648972c
Is QEMU virt still intended to be supported as an RME emulation
platform? In particular, is this functionality simply not implemented
yet, or is there a reason why RME support is not planned for QEMU virt?
If this is not the appropriate place to discuss this, please let me
know :)
Thanks,
Kohei
> [6] kvmtool https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/kvmtool-cca.git cca/kvm-v17
>
> Known issues: RMMv2.0
> * RmiOpMemDonateReq:count (Uint14) is incompatible with RmiAddrRangeDesc4KB
> (Uint10) and RmiAddrRangeDesc16KB (Uint12). i.e., a larger contiguous request
> may not be satisfiable by the host. Arm is aware of this defect and a spec fix
> is in progress.
>
>
> Steven Price (7):
> firmware: arm_rmm: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM
> firmware: arm_rmm: Check for RMI support at init
> firmware: arm_rmm: Configure the RMM with the host's page size
> firmware: arm_rmm: Add support for SRO
> firmware: arm_rmm: Activate the RMM
> firmware: arm_rmm: Ensure the RMM has GPT entries for memory
> firmware: arm_rmm: Add wrappers for Realm related RMI commands
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Kconfig | 26 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c | 819 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h | 678 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/arm-smccc-rmi.h | 494 ++++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 2023 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/arm-smccc-rmi.h
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 9:59 [PATCH v17 0/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add RMM v2.0 base RMI support Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 9:59 ` [PATCH v17 1/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-08 6:19 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-08 10:37 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-08 22:41 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-09 8:39 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-10 9:47 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-10 9:54 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 9:59 ` [PATCH v17 2/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Check for RMI support at init Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-08 6:46 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-08 9:49 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 9:59 ` [PATCH v17 3/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-08 7:04 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-08 8:00 ` Kohei Enju
2026-09-08 10:59 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-09 2:01 ` Kohei Enju
2026-09-08 10:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 9:59 ` [PATCH v17 4/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add support for SRO Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-09 4:10 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-10 9:51 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 9:59 ` [PATCH v17 5/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Activate the RMM Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-09 4:29 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-09 8:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 9:59 ` [PATCH v17 6/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Ensure the RMM has GPT entries for memory Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-09 6:40 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-09 8:33 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-07 9:59 ` [PATCH v17 7/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add wrappers for Realm related RMI commands Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-09 7:15 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-09 8:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-08 4:09 ` Kohei Enju [this message]
2026-09-08 5:46 ` [PATCH v17 0/7] firmware: arm_rmm: Add RMM v2.0 base RMI support Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-08 7:30 ` Kohei Enju
2026-09-09 10:52 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-10 4:51 ` Kohei Enju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ap-C6NLnxuWWTMzi@FCCLS0092175.localdomain \
--to=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox