Linux Confidential Computing Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM/x86: Drop "1" as MSR emulation return value
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 11:31:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c70e2e92-487b-46bb-9f02-7daeff4f4dc7@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a7843b6-3c8a-4151-b3cf-3df59c93ce9f@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1823 bytes --]

On 28.05.26 17:50, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 28.05.26 15:21, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2026, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 28.05.26 15:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2026, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>> Please disregard this series, there is one complication sashiko made me
>>>>> aware of.
>>>>
>>>> Sashiko beat me to the punch. :-)
>>>>
>>>> See commit 2368048bf5c2 ("KVM: x86: Signal #GP, not -EPERM, on bad 
>>>> WRMSR(MCi_CTL/STATUS)")
>>>> for a real world example of how things can and will go wrong.
>>>
>>> Yeah, with Sashiko's pointer it was easy to spot.
>>>
>>> Question now is whether the already existing cases of -errno passed as return
>>> value are wrong or on purpose.
>>
>> What are the existing cases?
>>
>>> If the latter, there should be a comment for
>>> that, otherwise they need to be fixed..
>>>
>>> Disentangling the MSR emulation return values from the "normal" ones ("return
>>> to guest"/"return to user mode") will be quite interesting with the overloaded
>>> semantics of "1".
>>
>> LOL, "interesting".
> 
> What do you think about the following idea:
> 
> Lets pass struct msr_info * down to all functions which get their return
> value passed up. Then extend msr_info with a bool "return_to_guest" (valid
> only if !host_initiated), which should be set instead of passing "1" up to
> the caller (probably using an inline helper). Then the return value could
> be 0 or -errno, and after MSR emulation the return_to_guest indicator can
> be tested if needed.

In the end I think it is less error prone to define a struct kvm_msr_ret_t
used as return type, consisting of an int and a bool with the same semantics
as above. Helpers will still be a good idea IMHO.

I'll have a try how it looks like.


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-29  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28 11:35 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM/x86: Drop "1" as MSR emulation return value Juergen Gross
2026-05-28 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM/x86: Return -errno instead of "1" for VMX related MSR emulation Juergen Gross
2026-05-28 11:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM/x86: Drop "1" as MSR emulation return value Juergen Gross
2026-05-28 13:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-28 13:18     ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 13:21       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-28 14:01         ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 14:33         ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 15:32           ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-28 15:36             ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 15:50         ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-29  9:31           ` Juergen Gross [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c70e2e92-487b-46bb-9f02-7daeff4f4dc7@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox