From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM/x86: Drop "1" as MSR emulation return value
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 11:31:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c70e2e92-487b-46bb-9f02-7daeff4f4dc7@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a7843b6-3c8a-4151-b3cf-3df59c93ce9f@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1823 bytes --]
On 28.05.26 17:50, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 28.05.26 15:21, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2026, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 28.05.26 15:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2026, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>> Please disregard this series, there is one complication sashiko made me
>>>>> aware of.
>>>>
>>>> Sashiko beat me to the punch. :-)
>>>>
>>>> See commit 2368048bf5c2 ("KVM: x86: Signal #GP, not -EPERM, on bad
>>>> WRMSR(MCi_CTL/STATUS)")
>>>> for a real world example of how things can and will go wrong.
>>>
>>> Yeah, with Sashiko's pointer it was easy to spot.
>>>
>>> Question now is whether the already existing cases of -errno passed as return
>>> value are wrong or on purpose.
>>
>> What are the existing cases?
>>
>>> If the latter, there should be a comment for
>>> that, otherwise they need to be fixed..
>>>
>>> Disentangling the MSR emulation return values from the "normal" ones ("return
>>> to guest"/"return to user mode") will be quite interesting with the overloaded
>>> semantics of "1".
>>
>> LOL, "interesting".
>
> What do you think about the following idea:
>
> Lets pass struct msr_info * down to all functions which get their return
> value passed up. Then extend msr_info with a bool "return_to_guest" (valid
> only if !host_initiated), which should be set instead of passing "1" up to
> the caller (probably using an inline helper). Then the return value could
> be 0 or -errno, and after MSR emulation the return_to_guest indicator can
> be tested if needed.
In the end I think it is less error prone to define a struct kvm_msr_ret_t
used as return type, consisting of an int and a bool with the same semantics
as above. Helpers will still be a good idea IMHO.
I'll have a try how it looks like.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 11:35 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM/x86: Drop "1" as MSR emulation return value Juergen Gross
2026-05-28 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM/x86: Return -errno instead of "1" for VMX related MSR emulation Juergen Gross
2026-05-28 11:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM/x86: Drop "1" as MSR emulation return value Juergen Gross
2026-05-28 13:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-28 13:18 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 13:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-28 14:01 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 14:33 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 15:32 ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-28 15:36 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-28 15:50 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-05-29 9:31 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c70e2e92-487b-46bb-9f02-7daeff4f4dc7@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox