linux-coco.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:20:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cba1c8ce-9299-4013-910c-0ba6d205cd90@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2957090-fcf0-4dff-901e-d8ea975f2452@arm.com>

On 19/04/2024 10:34, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 12/04/2024 09:42, Steven Price wrote:
>> Each page within the protected region of the realm guest can be marked
>> as either RAM or EMPTY. Allow the VMM to control this before the guest
>> has started and provide the equivalent functions to change this (with
>> the guest's approval) at runtime.
>>
>> When transitioning from RIPAS RAM (1) to RIPAS EMPTY (0) the memory is
>> unmapped from the guest and undelegated allowing the memory to be reused
>> by the host. When transitioning to RIPAS RAM the actual population of
>> the leaf RTTs is done later on stage 2 fault, however it may be
>> necessary to allocate additional RTTs to represent the range requested.
> 
> minor nit: To give a bit more context:
> 
> "however it may be necessary to allocate additional RTTs in order for
> the RMM to track the RIPAS for the requested range".
> 
>>
>> When freeing a block mapping it is necessary to temporarily unfold the
>> RTT which requires delegating an extra page to the RMM, this page can
>> then be recovered once the contents of the block mapping have been
>> freed. A spare, delegated page (spare_page) is used for this purpose.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h |  16 ++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c             |   8 +-
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c             | 390 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 411 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h 
>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> index 915e76068b00..cc8f81cfc3c0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> @@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm, u32 
>> ia_bits);
>>   int kvm_create_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>   void kvm_destroy_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +               unsigned long ipa,
>> +               u64 size,
>> +               bool unmap_private);
>> +int realm_set_ipa_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +            unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> +            unsigned long ripas);
>> +
>>   #define RME_RTT_BLOCK_LEVEL    2
>>   #define RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL    3
>> @@ -114,4 +122,12 @@ static inline unsigned long 
>> rme_rtt_level_mapsize(int level)
>>       return (1UL << RME_RTT_LEVEL_SHIFT(level));
>>   }
>> +static inline bool realm_is_addr_protected(struct realm *realm,
>> +                       unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int ia_bits = realm->ia_bits;
>> +
>> +    return !(addr & ~(BIT(ia_bits - 1) - 1));
>> +}
>> +
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 46f0c4e80ace..8a7b5449697f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ static void invalidate_icache_guest_page(void *va, 
>> size_t size)
>>    * @start: The intermediate physical base address of the range to unmap
>>    * @size:  The size of the area to unmap
>>    * @may_block: Whether or not we are permitted to block
>> + * @only_shared: If true then protected mappings should not be unmapped
>>    *
>>    * Clear a range of stage-2 mappings, lowering the various 
>> ref-counts.  Must
>>    * be called while holding mmu_lock (unless for freeing the stage2 
>> pgd before
>> @@ -317,7 +318,7 @@ static void invalidate_icache_guest_page(void *va, 
>> size_t size)
>>    * with things behind our backs.
>>    */
>>   static void __unmap_stage2_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t 
>> start, u64 size,
>> -                 bool may_block)
>> +                 bool may_block, bool only_shared)
>>   {
>>       struct kvm *kvm = kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(mmu);
>>       phys_addr_t end = start + size;
>> @@ -330,7 +331,7 @@ static void __unmap_stage2_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu 
>> *mmu, phys_addr_t start, u64
>>   static void unmap_stage2_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t 
>> start, u64 size)
>>   {
>> -    __unmap_stage2_range(mmu, start, size, true);
>> +    __unmap_stage2_range(mmu, start, size, true, false);
>>   }
>>   static void stage2_flush_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
>> @@ -1771,7 +1772,8 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
>> kvm_gfn_range *range)
>>       __unmap_stage2_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, range->start << PAGE_SHIFT,
>>                    (range->end - range->start) << PAGE_SHIFT,
>> -                 range->may_block);
>> +                 range->may_block,
>> +                 range->only_shared);
>>       return false;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> index 629a095bea61..9e5983c51393 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> @@ -79,6 +79,12 @@ static phys_addr_t __alloc_delegated_page(struct 
>> realm *realm,
>>       return phys;
>>   }
>> +static phys_addr_t alloc_delegated_page(struct realm *realm,
>> +                    struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
>> +{
>> +    return __alloc_delegated_page(realm, mc, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void free_delegated_page(struct realm *realm, phys_addr_t phys)
>>   {
>>       if (realm->spare_page == PHYS_ADDR_MAX) {
>> @@ -94,6 +100,151 @@ static void free_delegated_page(struct realm 
>> *realm, phys_addr_t phys)
>>       free_page((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(phys));
>>   }
>> +static int realm_rtt_create(struct realm *realm,
>> +                unsigned long addr,
>> +                int level,
>> +                phys_addr_t phys)
>> +{
>> +    addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, rme_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1));
>> +    return rmi_rtt_create(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), phys, addr, level);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_rtt_fold(struct realm *realm,
>> +              unsigned long addr,
>> +              int level,
>> +              phys_addr_t *rtt_granule)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long out_rtt;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = rmi_rtt_fold(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), addr, level, &out_rtt);
>> +
>> +    if (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret) == RMI_SUCCESS && rtt_granule)
>> +        *rtt_granule = out_rtt;
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_destroy_protected(struct realm *realm,
>> +                   unsigned long ipa,
>> +                   unsigned long *next_addr)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
>> +    unsigned long addr;
>> +    phys_addr_t rtt;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +loop:
>> +    ret = rmi_data_destroy(rd, ipa, &addr, next_addr);
>> +    if (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret) == RMI_ERROR_RTT) {
>> +        if (*next_addr > ipa)
>> +            return 0; /* UNASSIGNED */
>> +        rtt = alloc_delegated_page(realm, NULL);
>> +        if (WARN_ON(rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX))
>> +            return -1;
>> +        /* ASSIGNED - ipa is mapped as a block, so split */
>> +        ret = realm_rtt_create(realm, ipa,
>> +                       RMI_RETURN_INDEX(ret) + 1, rtt);
> 
> Could we not go all the way to L3 (rather than 1 level deeper) and try
> again ? That way, we are covered for block mappings at L1 (1G).
> 
>> +        if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
>> +            free_delegated_page(realm, rtt);
>> +            return -1;
>> +        }
>> +        /* retry */
>> +        goto loop;
>> +    } else if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +    ret = rmi_granule_undelegate(addr);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * If the undelegate fails then something has gone seriously
>> +     * wrong: take an extra reference to just leak the page
>> +     */
>> +    if (WARN_ON(ret))
>> +        get_page(phys_to_page(addr));
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void realm_unmap_range_shared(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                     int level,
>> +                     unsigned long start,
>> +                     unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> +    unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
>> +    ssize_t map_size = rme_rtt_level_mapsize(level);
>> +    unsigned long next_addr, addr;
>> +    unsigned long shared_bit = BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1);
>> +
>> +    if (WARN_ON(level > RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL))
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    start |= shared_bit;
>> +    end |= shared_bit;
>> +
>> +    for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
>> +        unsigned long align_addr = ALIGN(addr, map_size);
>> +        int ret;
>> +
>> +        next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
>> +
>> +        if (align_addr != addr || next_addr > end) {
>> +            /* Need to recurse deeper */
>> +            if (addr < align_addr)
>> +                next_addr = align_addr;
>> +            realm_unmap_range_shared(kvm, level + 1, addr,
>> +                         min(next_addr, end));
>> +            continue;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        ret = rmi_rtt_unmap_unprotected(rd, addr, level, &next_addr);
> 
> minor nit: We could potentially use rmi_rtt_destroy() to tear down
> shared mappings without unmapping them individually, if the range
> is big enough. All such optimisations could come later though.
> 
>> +        switch (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret)) {
>> +        case RMI_SUCCESS:
>> +            break;
>> +        case RMI_ERROR_RTT:
>> +            if (next_addr == addr) {
> 
> At this point we have a block aligned address, but the mapping is
> further deep. Given, start from top to down, we implicitly handle
> the case of block mappings. Not sure if that needs to be in a comment
> here.
> 
>> +                next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
> 
> Reset to the "actual next" as it was overwritten by the RMI call.
> 
>> +                realm_unmap_range_shared(kvm, level + 1, addr,
>> +                             next_addr);
>> +            }
>> +            break;
>> +        default:
>> +            WARN_ON(1);
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void realm_unmap_range_private(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                      unsigned long start,
>> +                      unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> +    ssize_t map_size = RME_PAGE_SIZE;
>> +    unsigned long next_addr, addr;
>> +
>> +    for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
>> +        int ret;
>> +
>> +        next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
>> +
>> +        ret = realm_destroy_protected(realm, addr, &next_addr);
>> +
>> +        if (WARN_ON(ret))
>> +            break;
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>> +                  unsigned long start,
>> +                  unsigned long end,
>> +                  bool unmap_private)
>> +{
>> +    realm_unmap_range_shared(kvm, RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL - 1, start, end);
> 
> minor nit: We already have a helper to find a suitable start level
> (defined below), may be we could use that ? And even do the rtt_destroy 
> optimisation for unprotected range.
> 
>> +    if (unmap_private)
>> +        realm_unmap_range_private(kvm, start, end);
>> +}
>> +
>>   u32 kvm_realm_ipa_limit(void)
>>   {
>>       return u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0, RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_S2SZ);
>> @@ -190,6 +341,30 @@ static int realm_rtt_destroy(struct realm *realm, 
>> unsigned long addr,
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>> +static int realm_create_rtt_levels(struct realm *realm,
>> +                   unsigned long ipa,
>> +                   int level,
>> +                   int max_level,
>> +                   struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
>> +{
>> +    if (WARN_ON(level == max_level))
>> +        return 0;
>> +
>> +    while (level++ < max_level) {
>> +        phys_addr_t rtt = alloc_delegated_page(realm, mc);
>> +
>> +        if (rtt == PHYS_ADDR_MAX)
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +        if (realm_rtt_create(realm, ipa, level, rtt)) {
>> +            free_delegated_page(realm, rtt);
>> +            return -ENXIO;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int realm_tear_down_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
>>                        unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>>   {
>> @@ -265,6 +440,68 @@ static int realm_tear_down_rtt_range(struct realm 
>> *realm,
>>                        start, end);
>>   }
>> +/*
>> + * Returns 0 on successful fold, a negative value on error, a 
>> positive value if
>> + * we were not able to fold all tables at this level.
>> + */
>> +static int realm_fold_rtt_level(struct realm *realm, int level,
>> +                unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    int not_folded = 0;
>> +    ssize_t map_size;
>> +    unsigned long addr, next_addr;
>> +
>> +    if (WARN_ON(level > RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL))
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    map_size = rme_rtt_level_mapsize(level - 1);
>> +
>> +    for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next_addr) {
>> +        phys_addr_t rtt_granule;
>> +        int ret;
>> +        unsigned long align_addr = ALIGN(addr, map_size);
>> +
>> +        next_addr = ALIGN(addr + 1, map_size);
>> +
>> +        ret = realm_rtt_fold(realm, align_addr, level, &rtt_granule);
>> +
>> +        switch (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(ret)) {
>> +        case RMI_SUCCESS:
>> +            if (!WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(rtt_granule)))
>> +                free_page((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(rtt_granule));
> 
> minor nit: Do we need a wrapper function for things like this, abd 
> leaking the page if undelegate fails, something like
> rme_reclaim_delegated_page()  ?
> 
> 
>> +            break;
>> +        case RMI_ERROR_RTT:
>> +            if (level == RME_RTT_MAX_LEVEL ||
>> +                RMI_RETURN_INDEX(ret) < level) {
>> +                not_folded++;
>> +                break;
>> +            }
>> +            /* Recurse a level deeper */
>> +            ret = realm_fold_rtt_level(realm,
>> +                           level + 1,
>> +                           addr,
>> +                           next_addr);
>> +            if (ret < 0)
>> +                return ret;
>> +            else if (ret == 0)
>> +                /* Try again at this level */
>> +                next_addr = addr;
>> +            break;
>> +        default:
>> +            return -ENXIO;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return not_folded;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_fold_rtt_range(struct realm *realm,
>> +                unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    return realm_fold_rtt_level(realm, get_start_level(realm) + 1,
>> +                    start, end);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void ensure_spare_page(struct realm *realm)
>>   {
>>       phys_addr_t tmp_rtt;
>> @@ -295,6 +532,147 @@ void kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(struct kvm *kvm, u32 
>> ia_bits)
>>       WARN_ON(realm_tear_down_rtt_range(realm, 0, (1UL << ia_bits)));
>>   }
>> +void kvm_realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long ipa, u64 size,
>> +               bool unmap_private)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long end = ipa + size;
>> +    struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>> +
>> +    end = min(BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), end);
>> +
>> +    ensure_spare_page(realm);
>> +
>> +    realm_unmap_range(kvm, ipa, end, unmap_private);
>> +
>> +    realm_fold_rtt_range(realm, ipa, end);
> 
> Shouldn't this be :
> 
>      if (unmap_private)
>          realm_fold_rtt_range(realm, ipa, end);
> 
> Also it is fine to reclaim RTTs from the protected space, not the
> unprotected half, as long as we use RTT_DESTROY in unmap_shared routine.

Thinking about this a bit more, we could :
1. Rename this to realm_reclaim_rtts_range()
2. Use "FOLD" vs "DESTROY" depending on the state of the Realm. If the
    realm is DYING (or add a state in the kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy() to
    indicate that stage2 can now be "destroyed")  and use DESTROY
    wherever it is safe to do so.

Suzuki


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-12  8:40 [v2] Support for Arm CCA VMs on Linux Steven Price
2024-04-11 18:54 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-04-15  8:14   ` Steven Price
2024-06-01 20:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-12  8:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] arm64: Support for running as a guest in Arm CCA Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 01/14] arm64: rsi: Add RSI definitions Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 02/14] arm64: Detect if in a realm and set RIPAS RAM Steven Price
2024-05-10 17:35     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-14 10:18       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-05-16 14:32         ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-15 15:03       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 03/14] arm64: realm: Query IPA size from the RMM Steven Price
2024-05-13 14:03     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-16 15:13       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 04/14] arm64: Mark all I/O as non-secure shared Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 05/14] fixmap: Allow architecture overriding set_fixmap_io Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 06/14] arm64: Override set_fixmap_io Steven Price
2024-05-13 16:14     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-14 10:21       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 07/14] arm64: Make the PHYS_MASK_SHIFT dynamic Steven Price
2024-05-13 16:38     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-16 15:34       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 08/14] arm64: Enforce bounce buffers for realm DMA Steven Price
2024-05-13 16:56     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 09/14] arm64: Enable memory encrypt for Realms Steven Price
2024-04-15  3:13     ` kernel test robot
2024-04-25 13:42       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-25 15:52         ` Steven Price
2024-04-25 16:29         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-25 18:16           ` Emanuele Rocca
2024-05-14 18:00     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-15 10:47       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-05-16  7:48         ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-16  9:06           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-05-20 16:53         ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-20 20:32           ` Michael Kelley
2024-05-21 10:14             ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-21 15:58               ` Michael Kelley
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 10/14] arm64: Force device mappings to be non-secure shared Steven Price
2024-05-15  9:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-15 11:00       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-05-17  9:34         ` Catalin Marinas
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 11/14] efi: arm64: Map Device with Prot Shared Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 12/14] arm64: realm: Support nonsecure ITS emulation shared Steven Price
2024-05-15 11:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-22 15:52       ` Steven Price
2024-05-22 17:05         ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-23  9:57           ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 13/14] arm64: rsi: Interfaces to query attestation token Steven Price
2024-05-15 11:10     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-22 15:52       ` Steven Price
2024-05-31 16:29         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 14/14] virt: arm-cca-guest: TSM_REPORT support for realms Steven Price
2024-04-24 13:06     ` Thomas Fossati
2024-04-24 13:27       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-24 13:19     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42 ` [PATCH v2 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 01/43] KVM: Prepare for handling only shared mappings in mmu_notifier events Steven Price
2024-04-25  9:48     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-04-25 15:58       ` Steven Price
2024-04-25 22:56         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 02/43] kvm: arm64: pgtable: Track the number of pages in the entry level Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 03/43] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 04/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2024-04-16 11:17     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-18 13:17       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 05/43] arm64: RME: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2024-04-16 12:38     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-18 13:17       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 06/43] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2024-04-16 13:14     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-19 11:18       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 07/43] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init Steven Price
2024-04-16 13:30     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-22 15:39       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 08/43] arm64: RME: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 09/43] arm64: RME: ioctls to create and configure realms Steven Price
2024-04-17  9:51     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-22 16:33       ` Steven Price
2024-04-18 16:04     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 10/43] kvm: arm64: Expose debug HW register numbers for Realm Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 11/43] arm64: kvm: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2024-04-17 10:20     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 12/43] arm64: RME: Keep a spare page delegated to the RMM Steven Price
2024-04-17 10:19     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 13/43] arm64: RME: RTT handling Steven Price
2024-04-17 13:37     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-24 10:59       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 14/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2024-04-18  9:23     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 15/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 16/43] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2024-04-18  9:30     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 17/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS Steven Price
2024-04-19  9:34     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-19 10:20       ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2024-05-01 15:47       ` Steven Price
2024-05-02 10:16         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-25  9:53     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-05-01 14:27     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2024-05-01 14:56       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 18/43] arm64: RME: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2024-04-19 13:00     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 19/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 20/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2024-04-19 13:17     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 21/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2024-04-25 10:43     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-05-31 16:03       ` Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 22/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 23/43] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 24/43] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 25/43] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 26/43] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 27/43] arm64: rme: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 28/43] arm64: rme: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 29/43] arm64: rme: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 30/43] arm64: RME: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 31/43] arm64: rme: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 32/43] arm_pmu: Provide a mechanism for disabling the physical IRQ Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:42   ` [PATCH v2 33/43] arm64: rme: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2024-04-13 23:44     ` kernel test robot
2024-04-18 16:06       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 34/43] kvm: rme: Hide KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM for realm guests Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 35/43] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 36/43] arm64: RME: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 37/43] arm64: RME: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 38/43] arm64: RME: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 39/43] arm64: RME: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 40/43] arm64: RME: Provide register list for unfinalized RME RECs Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 41/43] arm64: RME: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 42/43] arm64: kvm: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2024-04-25 14:44     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-04-12  8:43   ` [PATCH v2 43/43] KVM: arm64: Allow activating realms Steven Price
2024-04-12 16:52 ` [v2] Support for Arm CCA VMs on Linux Jean-Philippe Brucker
2024-06-24  6:13 ` Itaru Kitayama
2024-06-26 13:39   ` Steven Price
2024-07-08  0:47     ` Itaru Kitayama

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cba1c8ce-9299-4013-910c-0ba6d205cd90@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).