Re: [PATCH RFC V10 4/7] KVM: guest_memfd: Use guest mem inodes instead of anonymous inodes

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 11.08.25 11:06, Shivank Garg wrote:
> From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> 
> guest_memfd's inode represents memory the guest_memfd is
> providing. guest_memfd's file represents a struct kvm's view of that
> memory.
> 
> Using a custom inode allows customization of the inode teardown
> process via callbacks. For example, ->evict_inode() allows
> customization of the truncation process on file close, and
> ->destroy_inode() and ->free_inode() allow customization of the inode
> freeing process.
> 
> Customizing the truncation process allows flexibility in management of
> guest_memfd memory and customization of the inode freeing process
> allows proper cleanup of memory metadata stored on the inode.
> 
> Memory metadata is more appropriately stored on the inode (as opposed
> to the file), since the metadata is for the memory and is not unique
> to a specific binding and struct kvm.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
> ---

[...]

>   
>   static int kvm_gmem_migrate_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
> @@ -463,11 +503,71 @@ bool __weak kvm_arch_supports_gmem_mmap(struct kvm *kvm)
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +static struct inode *kvm_gmem_inode_make_secure_inode(const char *name,
> +						      loff_t size, u64 flags)
> +{
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +
> +	inode = anon_inode_make_secure_inode(kvm_gmem_mnt->mnt_sb, name, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(inode))
> +		return inode;
> +
> +	inode->i_private = (void *)(unsigned long)flags;
> +	inode->i_op = &kvm_gmem_iops;
> +	inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &kvm_gmem_aops;
> +	inode->i_mode |= S_IFREG;
> +	inode->i_size = size;
> +	mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_HIGHUSER);
> +	mapping_set_inaccessible(inode->i_mapping);
> +	/* Unmovable mappings are supposed to be marked unevictable as well. */
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!mapping_unevictable(inode->i_mapping));
> +
> +	return inode;
> +}
> +
> +static struct file *kvm_gmem_inode_create_getfile(void *priv, loff_t size,
> +						  u64 flags)
> +{
> +	static const char *name = "[kvm-gmem]";
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	struct file *file;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = -ENOENT;

Maybe add a comment here when the module reference will get
dropped. And maybe we should just switch to fops_get() + fops_put?

/* __fput() will take care of fops_put(). */
if (!fops_get(&kvm_gmem_fops))
	goto err;

> +
> +	inode = kvm_gmem_inode_make_secure_inode(name, size, flags);
> +	if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(inode);
> +		goto err_put_module;
> +	}
> +
> +	file = alloc_file_pseudo(inode, kvm_gmem_mnt, name, O_RDWR,
> +				 &kvm_gmem_fops);
> +	if (IS_ERR(file)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(file);
> +		goto err_put_inode;
> +	}
> +
> +	file->f_flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
> +	file->private_data = priv;
> +
> +out:
> +	return file;
> +
> +err_put_inode:
> +	iput(inode);
> +err_put_module:
> +	module_put(kvm_gmem_fops.owner);

fops_put(&kvm_gmem_fops);

?


Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb