Linux Confidential Computing Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>, Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86/xen: Don't truncate RAX when handling hypercall from protected guest
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 17:55:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc62e58e-b6ee-41e1-84a5-0716822fefc8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7af5a04a11432ea1878431e8b51061f19c16061.camel@infradead.org>



On 5/18/2026 5:50 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-05-18 at 17:43 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/18/2026 3:15 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2026-05-18 at 10:19 +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>>>>   	longmode = is_64_bit_hypercall(vcpu);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the variable name misleading?
>>>>>
>>>>> It most definitely is.  However, @longmode is passed around quite a few locations
>>>>> in xen.c, and so I don't want to opportunistically fix this one variable.  Though
>>>>> I'm definitely not opposed to a separate patch to rename them all to is_64bit or
>>>>> something.
>>>>
>>>> OK, I can do it.
>>>
>>> This one (as shown above) is clearly indicating whether this particular
>>> vCPU is in 64-bit mode for this particular hypercall. Changing that to
>>> is_64bit makes sense.
>>>
>>> However, there is a separate overall mode for the VM, which is stored
>>> in 'kvm->arch.xen.long_mode' and accessed by userspace using the
>>> KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_LONG_MODE attribute. It affects the datatypes used by
>>> shared memory data structures, and is also latched by the kernel when
>>> the guest writes the MSR for the hypercall page. That one should
>>> probably keep its name.
>>
>> For this one, I think the current KVM code is consistent.
>> The format is determined by EFER.LMA, whether the guest is running in 64 bit or
>> compatible mode doesn't change the ABI.
> 
> Agreed. For the hypercall case you're looking at, switching the name to
> is_64bit makes sense.
> 
>> struct compat_shared_info is used only when the guest is running natively in a
>> 32-bit build.
> 
> The struct compat_shared_info is also used in !kvm->arch.xen.long_mode
> on a 64-bit host, as that's what means the guest is considered to be a
> 32-bit guest.
> 
> It's somewhat orthogonal from whether any given vCPU is making any
> given hypercall while in 64-bit mode. The 'long_mode' is *latched* at
> certain specific times which are defined by Xen's historical behaviour.
> 
> I'm suggesting that you clean up longmode→is_64bit for the *hypercalls*
> but leave 'long_mode' as is.
> 

Yes, will only do it for is_64_bit_hypercall().

> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-18  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-14 21:53 [PATCH v2 00/15] KVM: x86: Clean up kvm_<reg>_{read,write}() mess Sean Christopherson
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: SVM: Truncate INVLPGA address in compatibility mode Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  6:36   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: x86/xen: Bug the VM if 32-bit KVM observes a 64-bit mode hypercall Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  6:46   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86/xen: Don't truncate RAX when handling hypercall from protected guest Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  7:21   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-15 12:55     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-18  2:19       ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-18  7:15         ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-18  9:43           ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-18  9:50             ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-18  9:55               ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: VMX: Read 32-bit GPR values for ENCLS instructions outside of 64-bit mode Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  7:26   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: x86: Trace hypercall register *after* truncating values for 32-bit Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  7:32   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_cache_regs.h => regs.h Sean Christopherson
2026-05-14 22:28   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-15  7:45   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: x86: Move inlined CR and DR helpers from x86.h to regs.h Sean Christopherson
2026-05-14 22:30   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-05-15  8:07   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86: Add mode-aware versions of kvm_<reg>_{read,write}() helpers Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  8:46   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-18 11:31   ` Huang, Kai
2026-05-18 20:51     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-18 22:29       ` Huang, Kai
2026-05-18 23:44       ` Huang, Kai
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86: Drop non-raw kvm_<reg>_write() helpers Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  9:11   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: nSVM: Use kvm_rax_read() now that it's mode-aware Sean Christopherson
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] Revert "KVM: VMX: Read 32-bit GPR values for ENCLS instructions outside of 64-bit mode" Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  9:26   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: x86: Harden is_64_bit_hypercall() against bugs on 32-bit kernels Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15  9:31   ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: x86: Move update_cr8_intercept() to lapic.c Sean Christopherson
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Move kvm_pv_async_pf_enabled() to x86.h (as an inline) Sean Christopherson
2026-05-14 21:53 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: x86: Move the bulk of register specific code from x86.c to regs.c Sean Christopherson
2026-05-19 12:16   ` Huang, Kai
2026-05-19 15:04     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-14 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] KVM: x86: Clean up kvm_<reg>_{read,write}() mess Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc62e58e-b6ee-41e1-84a5-0716822fefc8@linux.intel.com \
    --to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox