From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@kernel.org>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] x86/tdx: Mark TSC reliable
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 04:47:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5dc2de9d3997c3a89bdedee6cb0bf554f400ccc.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822231823.3205-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 02:18 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> In x86 virtualization environments, including TDX, RDTSC instruction is
> handled without causing a VM exit, resulting in minimal overhead and
> jitters. On the other hand, other clock sources (such as HPET, ACPI
> timer, APIC, etc.) necessitate VM exits to implement, resulting in more
> fluctuating measurements compared to TSC. Thus, those clock sources are
> not effective for calibrating TSC.
>
> In TD guests, TSC is virtualized by the TDX module, which ensures:
>
> - Virtual TSC values are consistent among all the TD’s VCPUs;
> - Monotonously incrementing for any single VCPU;
Nit:
- Virtual TSC is monotonously incrementing ...
Otherwise here "incrementing" looks like a noun, which means you need to use
"monotonous" rather than "monotonously".
> - The frequency is determined by TD configuration. The host TSC is
> invariant on platforms where TDX is available.
>
> Reliable TSC is architectural guarantee for the TDX platform and it must
> work for any sane TDX implementation.
>
> Use TSC as the only reliable clock source in TD guests, bypassing
> unstable calibration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 23:18 [PATCHv2] x86/tdx: Mark TSC reliable Kirill A. Shutemov
2023-08-22 23:46 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-08-23 4:47 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2023-08-23 11:11 ` kirill.shutemov
2023-08-23 18:50 ` Isaku Yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5dc2de9d3997c3a89bdedee6cb0bf554f400ccc.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).