From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tabi Timur-B04825 Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: don't use the byte channel handle as a parameter in ehv_bytechan.c Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:11:55 +0000 Message-ID: <4E7BDCDA.6060506@freescale.com> References: <1316543217-13769-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20110922230640.GA16981@kroah.com> <4E7BC1A9.5050708@freescale.com> <20110922232828.GA12088@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110922232828.GA12088@kroah.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: Sender: linux-console-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Greg KH Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , "linux-console@vger.kernel.org" Greg KH wrote: >>> > > This patch doesn't apply at all to my tty tree, what was it made >>> > > against? >> > >> > An internal repository that supposed to be in-sync with the latest and greatest. >> > >> > What's the URL for your tty-next repo? > There is no public one due to kernel.org being down. > > Does your patch apply to linux-next? It does not, and I see why now. Looks like the internal tree is not in sync after all. I will post a V2 shortly. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale