From: "Horia Geantă" <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam: disable pkc for non-E SoCs
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:51:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b8ae053-698b-2c03-c729-c4c86ba79550@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210915220307.3079917-1-michael@walle.cc>
On 9/16/2021 1:03 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
> On newer CAAM versions, not all accelerators are disabled if the SoC is
> a non-E variant. While the driver checks most of the modules for
> availability, there is one - PKHA - which sticks out. On non-E variants
Currently there's no dedicated support for "partially disabled" non-E
(export-controlled) parts in Linux kernel caam driver(s).
Up until recently firmware (U-boot) was deleting the "crypto" DT node
for all non-E parts [1].
Modifying the f/w indeed triggers changes across the s/w stack.
Since you are modifying only the caam code handling PKHA, is it correct
to assume that everything else is working fine?
For example: is the number of AES accelerators (AESA_VERSION[AESA_NUM])
being reported as 0 on non-E parts?
> it is still reported as available, that is the number of instances is
> non-zero, but it has limited functionality. In particular it doesn't
> support encryption and decryption, but just signing and verifying. This
> is indicated by a bit in the PKHA_MISC field. Take this bit into account
> if we are checking for availablitly.
typo: ^ availability
>
> This will the following error:
> [ 8.167817] caam_jr 8020000.jr: 20000b0f: CCB: desc idx 11: : Invalid CHA selected.
>
> Tested on an NXP LS1028A (non-E) SoC.
Thanks.
Unfortunately I don't have a non-E part to test on.
Horia
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/ff146322-e8c7-2418-ceb1-a3c0d4cee1a1@nxp.com
4eecc6f1a104 ("armv8: layerscape: don't remove crypto node if just partially disabled")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-15 22:03 [PATCH] crypto: caam: disable pkc for non-E SoCs Michael Walle
2021-09-22 15:51 ` Horia Geantă [this message]
2021-09-22 17:55 ` Michael Walle
2021-09-23 14:26 ` Horia Geantă
2021-09-24 8:08 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b8ae053-698b-2c03-c729-c4c86ba79550@nxp.com \
--to=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox