From: Oliver Mangold <o.mangold@gmail.com>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Poor RNG performance on Ryzen
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:12:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218e9b7-4eeb-d8a0-02b2-8ddd672ec454@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I was wondering why reading from /dev/urandom is much slower on Ryzen
than on Intel, and did some analysis. It turns out that the RDRAND
instruction is at fault, which takes much longer on AMD.
if I read this correctly:
--- drivers/char/random.c ---
862 spin_lock_irqsave(&crng->lock, flags);
863 if (arch_get_random_long(&v))
864 crng->state[14] ^= v;
865 chacha20_block(&crng->state[0], out);
one call to RDRAND (with 64-bit operand) is issued per computation of a
chacha20 block. According to the measurements I did, it seems on Ryzen
this dominates the time usage:
On Broadwell E5-2650 v4:
---
# dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1M status=progress
28827451392 bytes (29 GB) copied, 143.290349 s, 201 MB/s
# perf top
49.88% [kernel] [k] chacha20_block
31.22% [kernel] [k] _extract_crng
---
On Ryzen 1800X:
---
# dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1M status=progress
3169845248 bytes (3,2 GB, 3,0 GiB) copied, 42,0106 s, 75,5 MB/s
# perf top
76,40% [kernel] [k] _extract_crng
13,05% [kernel] [k] chacha20_block
---
An easy improvement might be to replace the usage of
arch_get_random_long() by arch_get_random_int(), as the state array
contains just 32-bit elements, and (contrary to Intel) on Ryzen 32-bit
RDRAND is supposed to be faster by roughly a factor of 2.
Best regards,
OM
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 7:12 Oliver Mangold [this message]
2017-07-21 9:26 ` Poor RNG performance on Ryzen Jan Glauber
2017-07-21 11:39 ` Oliver Mangold
2017-07-21 14:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-21 14:55 ` Oliver Mangold
2017-07-22 18:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-25 6:20 ` Jan Glauber
2017-07-21 15:04 ` Gary R Hook
2017-07-21 12:11 ` Jeffrey Walton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1218e9b7-4eeb-d8a0-02b2-8ddd672ec454@gmail.com \
--to=o.mangold@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox