From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: add key wrapping block chaining mode
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:11:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12434918.9URe3Fjl50@myon.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5036814.6LNlN5eOjK@myon.chronox.de>
Am Mittwoch, 22. April 2015, 14:23:04 schrieb Stephan Mueller:
Hi,
> Am Mittwoch, 22. April 2015, 14:13:54 schrieb Herbert Xu:
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 01:53:24PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 06:36:59AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > > The key wrapping is an authenticated encryption operation without
> > > > associated data. Therefore, setting of AAD is permissible, but that
> > > > data
> > > > is not used by the cipher implementation.
> > >
> > > In that case you should return an error if AAD is provided rather
> > > than silently discarding them since by definition AEAD must include
> > > the AAD in the integrity value.
> >
> > In fact drop the AEAD altogether and just use ablkcipher. The
> > integrity value is then simply the output IV.
>
> Initially I was playing with ablkcipher. But then I moved to AEAD because
> the ciphertext is longer than the plaintext.
>
> Isn't it a basic assumption to ablkcipher is that the ciphertext is equal in
> size as the plaintext?
One more issue to consider: the key wrapping is an authenticated encryption /
decryption. Thus, decryption can return EBADMSG, a feature a normal blkcipher
does not do.
Key wrap is more than a blkcipher, but less than an AEAD. Thus, I would
consider the key wrapping as a speciality of AEAD where the "AD" part is
simply NULL (a valid use case of the "regular" AEAD ciphers).
--
Ciao
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-22 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 4:36 [PATCH] crypto: add key wrapping block chaining mode Stephan Mueller
2015-04-22 5:48 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-22 12:44 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-23 1:39 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-23 1:40 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-22 5:53 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-22 6:13 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-22 12:23 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-22 14:11 ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
2015-04-23 1:37 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-23 1:33 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-23 1:39 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-23 1:46 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-23 1:58 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-23 2:03 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-23 2:51 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-23 2:55 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-23 13:42 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-23 23:21 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-24 0:22 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-24 0:24 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-22 6:06 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12434918.9URe3Fjl50@myon.chronox.de \
--to=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox