Re: [RFC 1/7] crypto: Add GHASH digest algorithm for GCM

[Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 15:27 +0800, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Huang Ying | 2009-06-18 10:08:27 [+0800]:
> 
> >On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 04:04 +0800, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >> >+#include <linux/module.h>
> >> >+#include <linux/init.h>
> >> >+#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> >+#include <linux/crypto.h>
> >> >+#include <crypto/gf128mul.h>
> >> >+#include <crypto/algapi.h>
> >> >+#include <crypto/internal/hash.h>
> >> Do you mind to sort them?
> >
> >Sorry, can you tell me what is the better order?
> 
> For header files it shouldn't matter if you include linux/module.h
> followed by linux/init.h or the other way around. If you have them in
> one place and sorted you can easily find out where to put the next one
> and tell whether a specific header file is allready included. You also
> make it a little harder to include one header file twice. If you think
> this does not happen, a quick grep over the scsi tree shows:
> 
> |$ fgrep -R '#include ' drivers/scsi/ | sort > sort.txt
> |$ fgrep -R '#include ' drivers/scsi/ | sort -u > sort-u.txt
> |$ diff -u sort.txt sort-u.txt
> |--- sort.txt  2009-06-18 09:12:27.551876506 +0200
> |+++ sort-u.txt  2009-06-18 09:12:36.226342283 +0200
> |@@ -1347,7 +1347,6 @@
> | drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c:#include <linux/list.h>
> | drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c:#include <linux/module.h>
> | drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c:#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> |-drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c:#include <linux/netdevice.h>
> | drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c:#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> | drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c:#include <linux/timer.h>
> | drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.c:#include <linux/types.h>
> |@@ -1623,7 +1622,6 @@
> | drivers/scsi/gdth.h:#include <linux/types.h>
> | drivers/scsi/gdth_proc.c:#include <linux/completion.h>
> | drivers/scsi/gvp11.c:#include "gvp11.h"
> |-drivers/scsi/gvp11.c:#include "gvp11.h"
> | drivers/scsi/gvp11.c:#include "scsi.h"
> | drivers/scsi/gvp11.c:#include "scsi_module.c"
> | drivers/scsi/gvp11.c:#include "wd33c93.h"
> |@@ -1718,7 +1716,6 @@
> | drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h:#include <linux/types.h>
> | drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:#include "ibmvscsi.h"
> | drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:#include <asm/firmware.h>
> |-drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:#include <asm/firmware.h>
> | drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:#include <asm/vio.h>
> | drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:#include <linux/delay.h>
> | drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c:#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> |@@ -2633,7 +2630,6 @@
> | drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c:#include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
> | drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c:#include <scsi/scsi_transport_sas.h>
> | drivers/scsi/mvme147.c:#include "mvme147.h"
> |-drivers/scsi/mvme147.c:#include "mvme147.h"
> | drivers/scsi/mvme147.c:#include "scsi.h"
> | drivers/scsi/mvme147.c:#include "scsi_module.c"
> | drivers/scsi/mvme147.c:#include "wd33c93.h"
> 
> SCSI was just a random example.

Sounds reasonable. I will do that.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying