From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] crypto: add jitterentropy RNG Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:05:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1429797908.2927.5.camel@x220> References: <5054521.el7mZro33c@myon.chronox.de> <5676005.EdpjbaV0S3@myon.chronox.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Andreas Steffen , Theodore Ts'o , Sandy Harris , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Stephan Mueller Return-path: Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.30]:54866 "EHLO lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758019AbbDWOFQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:05:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5676005.EdpjbaV0S3@myon.chronox.de> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: A nit only, I'm afraid: this patch adds a license mismatch. On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 21:25 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/crypto/jitterentropy.c > + * License > + * ======= > + * > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions > + * are met: > + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > + * notice, and the entire permission notice in its entirety, > + * including the disclaimer of warranties. > + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the > + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > + * 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote > + * products derived from this software without specific prior > + * written permission. > + * > + * ALTERNATIVELY, this product may be distributed under the terms of > + * the GNU General Public License, in which case the provisions of the GPL2 are > + * required INSTEAD OF the above restrictions. (This clause is > + * necessary due to a potential bad interaction between the GPL and > + * the restrictions contained in a BSD-style copyright.) > + * > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED > + * WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES > + * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ALL OF > + * WHICH ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE > + * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR > + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT > + * OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR > + * BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT > + * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE > + * USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF NOT ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > + * DAMAGE. > + */ This states the license is BSD or GPL v2. > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); And, according to inlude/linux/module.h, using MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL"); here would match that statement. Paul Bolle