From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] crypto: AES CBC multi-buffer glue code Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:19:23 -0700 Message-ID: <1446135563.14635.11.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> References: <1446067169.14635.7.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> <2511888.9MT8h10EQL@tauon.atsec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Herbert Xu , "H. Peter Anvin" , "David S.Miller" , Chandramouli Narayanan , Vinodh Gopal , James Guilford , Wajdi Feghali , Jussi Kivilinna , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Stephan Mueller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2511888.9MT8h10EQL@tauon.atsec.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 03:03 +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015, 14:19:29 schrieb Tim Chen: > > Hi Tim, > > >+ > >+ /* check for dependent cpu features */ > >+ if (!cpu_has_aes) { > >+ pr_err("aes_cbc_mb_mod_init: no aes support\n"); > >+ err = -ENODEV; > >+ goto err1; > >+ } > > In your post 0/5, you say that this mechanism needs AVX2. In the existing > AESNI glue code I find > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > #ifdef CONFIG_AS_AVX2 > if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AVX2)) { > > ... > > Why would that CPU check not be needed here? Good catch. Will add check for avx2. Tim > > Ciao > Stephan