From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] crypto: Multi-buffer encryptioin infrastructure support Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:30:14 -0800 Message-ID: <1447806614.4933.32.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> References: <1446157263.14635.15.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> <20151117130633.GB8032@gondor.apana.org.au> <1447801169.4933.28.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com> <20151118000748.GC13894@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , "David S.Miller" , Stephan Mueller , Chandramouli Narayanan , Vinodh Gopal , James Guilford , Wajdi Feghali , Jussi Kivilinna , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:51370 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753503AbbKRAaP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:30:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151118000748.GC13894@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 08:07 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:59:29PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > > > > Herbert, would you prefer me to use ablkcipher scatter walk instead, > > assuming the overhead of both walk are about the same? > > Well since you are going to potentially sleep in the middle of > an operation I'd think ablkcipher is required, no? We're using blkcipher walk in the implementation. As long as we use kmap and instead of kmap_atomic, it allows us to sleep in the middle of the walk. Tim