From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DRBG seeding
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:07:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505308.pr7rreheuo@tauon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150416143617.GA17178@gondor.apana.org.au>
Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015, 22:36:17 schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
>Hi Stephan:
>
>Currently DRBG is seeded with entropy from get_random_bytes.
>However, get_random_bytes is basically the kernel version of
>/dev/urandom. So there is no guarantee that you're actually
>getting the amount of entropy required.
>
>Are you sure this is compliant with the DRBG specification?
I do not see a specific requirement in SP800-90A about the quality of the
noise source.
But SP800-90B specifies tests and assessments about the quality. When applying
that specification, I applied some initial assessments: /dev/urandom complies
with SP800-90B when disregarding the very early boot stage (i.e. when assuming
that the input_pool received sufficient entropy).
The only shaky time is the boot time until the nonblocking_pool/input_pool has
been sufficiently seeded.
That said, I already developed an in-kernel version of /dev/random. I sent the
patch to LKML some half year ago. If I understood Ted Tso right, there is no
general objection against adding that in-kernel interface. See [1] for the
thread.
Furthermore, I already started working on updating the DRBG to use that in-
kernel /dev/random interface.
Shall I pursue that work in earnest now?
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/11/276
Ciao
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-16 14:36 DRBG seeding Herbert Xu
2015-04-16 15:07 ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
2015-04-16 15:26 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-16 15:32 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-16 17:11 ` Andreas Steffen
2015-04-17 1:19 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-17 2:14 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-17 12:48 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-17 13:11 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-17 13:22 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-18 1:27 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-18 1:32 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-18 1:36 ` Herbert Xu
2015-04-18 2:04 ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-18 2:16 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505308.pr7rreheuo@tauon \
--to=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox