From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>,
Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com,
bfields@redhat.com
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qestion] Lots of memory leaks when mounting and unmounting nfs client to server continuously.
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 14:49:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1541620162.4051.5.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5BD86392.7070200@huawei.com>
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 21:58 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> On 2018/10/30 21:06, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> > Hi zhong jiang,
> >
> > Try asking in linux-nfs.. but I'll also note that 3.10-stable may
> > be missing a number of fixes to leaks in the NFS GSS code.
> >
> > I can see a more than a few fixes to memory leaks with:
> > git log --grep=leak --oneline net/sunrpc/auth_gss/
> >
>
> Thanks for your reply. I has tested some of them in the upsteam as
> you have said. but It fails to solve the issue completely.
> hence, I turn to the relevant experts whether they have happened to
> the issue or can give some suggestion or not.
>
> Thanks,
> zhong jiang
> > Ben
> >
> > On 30 Oct 2018, at 8:45, zhong jiang wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Herbert
> > >
> > > Recently, I hit a memory leak issue when mounting and
> > > unmounting nfs with the way of krb5.
> > > The issue happens to the linux-3.10-stable.
> > >
> > > I find that slab-1024 and slab-512 will take up most of the
> > > memory. And it can not be freed.
> > > Meanwhile, it result in rpcsec_gss_krb5 can be unregistered as
> > > well.
> > >
> > >
Are you running the latest 3.10-stable?
This sounds very familiar to something I encountered a while ago and it
was a sunrpc cache related problem. The patch that fixed it for me is
in 3.10.106 though.
Can you check if this cache is growing indefinitely?
/proc/net/rpc/auth.rpcsec.context
If it is large, try to flush explicitly with:
date +%s > /proc/net/rpc/auth.rpcsec.context/flush
If all that checks out, you may need the below upstream fix, but it
went into v3.10.106 as
6a4a5fd svcrpc: don't leak contexts on PROC_DESTROY
commit 6a4a5fd4c7bc6a06ca26ad7327d046d8d3c0932a
Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jan 9 17:15:18 2017 -0500
svcrpc: don't leak contexts on PROC_DESTROY
commit 78794d1890708cf94e3961261e52dcec2cc34722 upstream.
Context expiry times are in units of seconds since boot, not unix time.
The use of get_seconds() here therefore sets the expiry time decades in
the future. This prevents timely freeing of contexts destroyed by
client RPC_GSS_PROC_DESTROY requests. We'd still free them eventually
(when the module is unloaded or the container shut down), but a lot of
contexts could pile up before then.
Fixes: c5b29f885afe "sunrpc: use seconds since boot in expiry cache"
Reported-by: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c
index 62663a0..e625efe 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c
@@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static void destroy_use_gss_proxy_proc_entry(struct net *net) {}
case RPC_GSS_PROC_DESTROY:
if (gss_write_verf(rqstp, rsci->mechctx, gc->gc_seq))
goto auth_err;
- rsci->h.expiry_time = get_seconds();
+ rsci->h.expiry_time = seconds_since_boot();
set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &rsci->h.flags);
if (resv->iov_len + 4 > PAGE_SIZE)
goto drop;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-08 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-30 12:45 [Qestion] Lots of memory leaks when mounting and unmounting nfs client to server continuously zhong jiang
2018-10-30 13:06 ` Benjamin Coddington
2018-10-30 13:58 ` zhong jiang
2018-10-30 14:03 ` Benjamin Coddington
2018-10-30 14:29 ` zhong jiang
2018-11-01 14:18 ` zhong jiang
2018-11-07 19:49 ` Dave Wysochanski [this message]
2018-11-13 6:40 ` zhong jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1541620162.4051.5.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).