From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix test for self-signed certificate
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:54:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16658.1456325653@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455197665-11199-1-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.com>
Hi Michal,
I have the attached patch already in my queue.
David
---
commit d19fcb825912c67e09e0575b95accaa42899e07f
Author: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 24 14:37:54 2016 +0000
X.509: Don't treat self-signed keys specially
Trust for a self-signed certificate can normally only be determined by
whether we obtained it from a trusted location (ie. it was built into the
kernel at compile time), so there's not really any point in checking it -
we could verify that the signature is valid, but it doesn't really tell us
anything if the signature checks out.
However, there's a bug in the code determining whether a certificate is
self-signed or not - if they have neither AKID nor SKID then we just assume
that the cert is self-signed, which may not be true.
Given this, remove the code that treats self-signed certs specially when it
comes to evaluating trustability and attempt to evaluate them as ordinary
signed certificates. We then expect self-signed certificates to fail the
trustability check and be marked as untrustworthy in x509_key_preparse().
Note that there is the possibility of the trustability check on a
self-signed cert then succeeding. This is most likely to happen when a
duplicate of the certificate is already on the trust keyring - in which
case it shouldn't be a problem.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
index 9e9e5a6a9ed6..fd76eca902b8 100644
--- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
+++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c
@@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ static int x509_validate_trust(struct x509_certificate *cert,
struct key *key;
int ret = 1;
+ if (!cert->akid_id || !cert->akid_skid)
+ return 1;
+
if (!trust_keyring)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -312,19 +315,23 @@ static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
cert->pub->algo = pkey_algo[cert->pub->pkey_algo];
cert->pub->id_type = PKEY_ID_X509;
- /* Check the signature on the key if it appears to be self-signed */
- if ((!cert->akid_skid && !cert->akid_id) ||
- asymmetric_key_id_same(cert->skid, cert->akid_skid) ||
- asymmetric_key_id_same(cert->id, cert->akid_id)) {
- ret = x509_check_signature(cert->pub, cert); /* self-signed */
- if (ret < 0)
- goto error_free_cert;
- } else if (!prep->trusted) {
+ /* See if we can derive the trustability of this certificate.
+ *
+ * When it comes to self-signed certificates, we cannot evaluate
+ * trustedness except by the fact that we obtained it from a trusted
+ * location. So we just rely on x509_validate_trust() failing in this
+ * case.
+ *
+ * Note that there's a possibility of a self-signed cert matching a
+ * cert that we have (most likely a duplicate that we already trust) -
+ * in which case it will be marked trusted.
+ */
+ if (!prep->trusted) {
ret = x509_validate_trust(cert, get_system_trusted_keyring());
if (ret)
ret = x509_validate_trust(cert, get_ima_mok_keyring());
if (!ret)
- prep->trusted = 1;
+ prep->trusted = true;
}
/* Propose a description */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 13:34 [PATCH] X.509: Fix test for self-signed certificate Michal Marek
2016-02-17 2:57 ` lee joey
2016-02-24 14:54 ` David Howells [this message]
2016-02-26 12:51 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16658.1456325653@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).