From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Mueller Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: aesni: add setkey for driver-gcm-aes-aesni Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 22:20:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1876694.bQrN48MF7q@tauon> References: <2587101.YvN0IxRmOH@tachyon.chronox.de> <40625395.stBBYbAQtz@tachyon.chronox.de> <54C1403D.1010608@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, 'LKML' To: Tadeusz Struk Return-path: Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:60109 "EHLO mail.eperm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753898AbbAVVUi (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:20:38 -0500 Received: from tauon.localnet by mail.eperm.de with [XMail 1.27 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 22:20:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54C1403D.1010608@intel.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2015, 10:23:57 schrieb Tadeusz Struk: Hi Tadeusz, >On 01/20/2015 05:25 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote: >>> Rather than adding a bogus setkey function, please fix this mess >>> properly by moving the top-level setkey function into the __driver >>> one where it should be. Compare with how we handle it in the >>> ablk_helper which is pretty much the same thing. >> >> Tadeusz, are you working on that update or shall I have a look? > >Hi, >No, I thought that the agreement was that we don't want to allow user >space to use these helpers directly, right? Am I missing something? That would be correct. But if I understood Herbert correctly, he is creating a patch that disables these service ciphers for general usage. Ciao Stephan