From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Locking for HW crypto accelerators
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:19:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2002208.sm9qV7UXju@tauon.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPd7JdzM2_PiHkS1ix1yU9hZmMbGDZaL07vbON0XzORH=w@mail.gmail.com>
Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2018, 15:09:05 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
Hi Krzysztof,
> Thanks Stephan for hints. Let's assume the each of init, update and
> final are atomic... but how about the relation between update and
> final? I have two concurrent users in user-space but only one HW:
>
> Process A: Process B:
> init() and set_key()
> init() and different key
> update(some_data)
> update(different_data)
> final()
> final()
>
> The final() from process A will now produce the result of hashing/CRC
> of some_data and different_data (and even maybe mixed with init() for
> different key). All because in the meantime process B added its own
> data to the HW.
The question is where is the state of the cipher operation kept that is
produced with each of the init/update/final calls. Your answer implies that
this state is kept in hardware.
But commonly the state is kept in software. Look at ahash_request for example,
the __ctx pointer is intended to point to the memory the driver needs to store
its state.
Pick a random driver implementation and search for ahash_request_ctx, for
example.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Ciao
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-30 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-30 12:22 Locking for HW crypto accelerators Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-08-30 12:56 ` Stephan Mueller
2018-08-30 13:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-08-30 13:19 ` Stephan Mueller [this message]
2018-08-30 13:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-08-30 13:27 ` Kamil Konieczny
2018-08-30 13:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-08-30 13:39 ` Herbert Xu
2018-08-30 14:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2002208.sm9qV7UXju@tauon.chronox.de \
--to=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox