Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:16:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070820101618.GE16680@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1IMveX-0002Kv-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>

> Are you sure you get the C version when both are built-in
> or loaded as modules? If so then we have a bug in the priority
> code.

The usual use case is: Somebody -- either admin or some command 
implicitely -- executes modprobe aes because some text file
specifies the aes cipher. At least on my system that loads
the C version when both are enabled. modprobe will not load
multiple modules in this case.

I don't think modprobe knows anything about these priorities.

> We don't, but the system is meant to allow multiple
> implementations to coexist and picking the best one
> at run-time.

But that would require teaching the module loading user space
about all this first, right?

Also if one implementation is always better than the other
then I see little reason to ever have both.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-20  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-20  0:34 {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations Andi Kleen
2007-08-20  1:01 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-20 10:16   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-08-20  9:45     ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-08-20 10:47       ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 10:08         ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-08-20 11:12           ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 11:27             ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-08-20 12:06     ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-20 13:06       ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 13:07         ` Herbert Xu
2007-09-02 22:42         ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-09-04 13:58           ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-19 12:29           ` Herbert Xu
2007-09-19 21:46             ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-09-20  0:20               ` Herbert Xu
2007-09-20 21:09                 ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-09-30 12:23                   ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-09-30 12:42       ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-03  7:35         ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-04  8:35           ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-03 19:23             ` [PATCH] [crypto] load the DES module by an alias Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-05  8:48               ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-04  7:37             ` [PATCH] [crypto] load the AES " Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-05  8:52               ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-04  7:37             ` [PATCH] [crypto] load the SHA1[1|256] " Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-05  8:57               ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-05 13:50                 ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-05 13:12                   ` [PATCH] [crypto] load the SHA1[1|256] module by an alias (v2) Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-05 15:10                     ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-06 22:02                       ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-08  3:21                         ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-07 21:42                       ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-08  3:20                         ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-08 12:35                           ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-08  4:12                     ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-05 14:20                   ` [PATCH] [crypto] load the SHA1[1|256] module by an alias Herbert Xu
2007-10-06 21:54                     ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-08 11:25               ` Jan Glauber
2007-10-08 11:30                 ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-04  8:48             ` {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations Herbert Xu
2007-10-04  9:31               ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-04 10:00                 ` Sebastian Siewior
2007-10-04 10:00                 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-04  9:39               ` Sebastian Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070820101618.GE16680@bingen.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox