From: David McCullough <David_Mccullough@securecomputing.com>
To: Eran Ben-Avi <eranpublic@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, ocf-linux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:44:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070830224448.GA11140@securecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440337.35301.qm@web62504.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
>
> --- David McCullough
> <David_Mccullough@securecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance
> > between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMARTBIT)
> > on ARM 500MHz with latest OCF patched on
> > Openswan2.4.9 and I noticed the callback functions
> > are using workqueue.
> > > Since RX was performed in NAPI mode with higher
> > priority then TX (in workqueue), the callback
> > function(in ipsec_ocf.c) was starved with zero
> > routing.
> > > The problem was solved after I switched to use
> > tasklet instead of the workqueue.
> > > Is there a room for updating next OCF release ?
> >
> > Sure, send in a patch. This is against
> > ocf-linux-20070727 right ?
>
> Yes.
> Can you please estimate when next release will be
> ready?
When there is a need, I can turn it around in a day or so.
I could also post a patch that is current much more quickly
if you would prefer ?
Cheers,
Davidm
--
David McCullough, david_mccullough@securecomputing.com, Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org http://www.cyberguard.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-30 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070827224021.GA23450@securecomputing.com>
2007-08-30 7:58 ` Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ? Eran Ben-Avi
2007-08-30 22:44 ` David McCullough [this message]
2007-09-11 19:19 ` Kabir Ahsan-r9aahw
2007-09-12 12:13 ` David McCullough
2007-09-26 14:26 ` David McCullough
2007-11-01 14:34 Eran Ben-Avi
2007-11-05 3:35 ` David McCullough
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-27 7:26 Eran Ben-Avi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070830224448.GA11140@securecomputing.com \
--to=david_mccullough@securecomputing.com \
--cc=eranpublic@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocf-linux-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox