From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH] [crypto] geode: do not copy the IV too often Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:42:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20071126094226.GA18532@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <20071113231132.GA10680@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20071114142253.GA15201@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071115212335.GB21159@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20071126092521.GC18309@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20071126092832.GA25693@gondor.apana.org.au> Reply-To: Sebastian Siewior Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:49350 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751441AbXKZJm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:42:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071126092832.GA25693@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org * Herbert Xu | 2007-11-26 17:28:32 [+0800]: >On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:25:21AM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote: >> >> I saw that you rebased your cryptodev tree but you did not include >> this patch. Should I resend it? > >I had to check my archives to refresh my memory :) > >OK I dropped it because: > >: How about just change op->iv to a pointer and assigning walk->iv >: to it? That should make a smaller patch. Sorry, I've overlooked it somehow. Since extra four bytes don't hurt that much I will change it. >Thanks, Sebastian