Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12680] New: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt.
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:05:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209130536.9a7a87cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12680-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>


(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Mon,  9 Feb 2009 09:12:59 -0800 (PST)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
> 
>            Summary: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
>                     probing on modules insertion attempt.
>            Product: Drivers
>            Version: 2.5
>      KernelVersion: Any 2.6.29 release candidate
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: Other
>         AssignedTo: drivers_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org

hm, we don't seem to have a bugzilla category for crypto.

>         ReportedBy: v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr
> 
> 
> Latest working kernel version: 2.6.28.4
> Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.29-rc1

I'll ask Rafael to track this as a post-2.6.28 regression.

> Distribution:
> Hardware Environment: IA32 i686 Athlon model 10
> Software Environment: Pristine kernel 2.6.29-rc4-git1 + Debian Lenny/Sid
> Problem Description: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
> probing on modules insertion attempt:
> 
>   I can't say whether this abnormally long probe delay occurs on "padlock_aes"
> or "padlock_sha" module insertion attempt or both.
> 
>   I do not have such hardware indeed.
> 
> I've never observed this problem so far with Linux version <= 2.6.28.4 .
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> 
> Power-on your system ;-)
> 
> In hope my report will prove useful.
> 

Neither of those drivers have changed in six months, so the breakage
must be elsewhere.

I guess this should be easy for others to reproduce.

How long is the "long" delay?

Please do this:

	add "log_buf_len=1M" to the kernel boot command line
	reboot

	dmesg -n 8
	modprobe padlock_aes &
	sleep 1
	echo t > /prog/sysrq-trigger
	dmesg -s 1000000 > foo

and then send us `foo'.  Pleas avoid wordwrapping it.

This will permit us to see where `modprobe' is getting stuck.

Thanks.


       reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-12680-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-02-09 21:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-09 21:59   ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 12680] New: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt Valentin QUEQUET
     [not found]   ` <4992FC7E.3010207@orange.fr>
2009-02-11 17:16     ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-11 19:28       ` Milan Broz
2009-02-11 20:55         ` [dm-devel] " Valentin QUEQUET

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090209130536.9a7a87cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox