From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12680] New: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt.
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:05:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209130536.9a7a87cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12680-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:12:59 -0800 (PST)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
>
> Summary: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
> probing on modules insertion attempt.
> Product: Drivers
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: Any 2.6.29 release candidate
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: drivers_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
hm, we don't seem to have a bugzilla category for crypto.
> ReportedBy: v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr
>
>
> Latest working kernel version: 2.6.28.4
> Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.29-rc1
I'll ask Rafael to track this as a post-2.6.28 regression.
> Distribution:
> Hardware Environment: IA32 i686 Athlon model 10
> Software Environment: Pristine kernel 2.6.29-rc4-git1 + Debian Lenny/Sid
> Problem Description: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
> probing on modules insertion attempt:
>
> I can't say whether this abnormally long probe delay occurs on "padlock_aes"
> or "padlock_sha" module insertion attempt or both.
>
> I do not have such hardware indeed.
>
> I've never observed this problem so far with Linux version <= 2.6.28.4 .
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> Power-on your system ;-)
>
> In hope my report will prove useful.
>
Neither of those drivers have changed in six months, so the breakage
must be elsewhere.
I guess this should be easy for others to reproduce.
How long is the "long" delay?
Please do this:
add "log_buf_len=1M" to the kernel boot command line
reboot
dmesg -n 8
modprobe padlock_aes &
sleep 1
echo t > /prog/sysrq-trigger
dmesg -s 1000000 > foo
and then send us `foo'. Pleas avoid wordwrapping it.
This will permit us to see where `modprobe' is getting stuck.
Thanks.
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-12680-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-02-09 21:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-09 21:59 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 12680] New: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt Valentin QUEQUET
[not found] ` <4992FC7E.3010207@orange.fr>
2009-02-11 17:16 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-11 19:28 ` Milan Broz
2009-02-11 20:55 ` [dm-devel] " Valentin QUEQUET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090209130536.9a7a87cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox