From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Stephan Mueller <stephan.mueller@atsec.com>
Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: add blocking facility to urandom
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:44:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110908084420.GC4032@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E67E1B0.2040309@atsec.com>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:27:12PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> And exactly that is the concern from organizations like BSI. Their
> cryptographer's concern is that due to the volume of data that you can
> extract from /dev/urandom, you may find cycles or patterns that increase
> the probability to guess the next random value compared to brute force
> attack. Note, it is all about probabilities.
So don't use /dev/urandom if you don't like the behaviour. Breaking all
existing application because of a certification is simply not an option.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-02 14:37 [PATCH] random: add blocking facility to urandom Jarod Wilson
2011-09-05 2:36 ` Sandy Harris
2011-09-06 14:09 ` Stephan Mueller
2011-09-07 17:38 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-07 18:12 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 18:26 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-07 19:05 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 19:30 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-07 20:00 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 19:35 ` Neil Horman
2011-09-07 19:27 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-09-07 19:36 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-08 2:43 ` Sandy Harris
2011-09-07 19:49 ` David Miller
2011-09-07 20:02 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-07 20:23 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 20:30 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-07 20:37 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 20:56 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-07 21:10 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 21:28 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-07 21:38 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 21:35 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-07 21:43 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-07 22:46 ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2011-09-08 7:21 ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-07 23:57 ` Neil Horman
2011-09-08 6:41 ` Tomas Mraz
2011-09-08 12:52 ` Neil Horman
2011-09-08 13:11 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-08 13:49 ` Neil Horman
2011-09-09 2:21 ` Sandy Harris
2011-09-09 13:04 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-09 16:25 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-09-09 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 13:56 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-13 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 12:18 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-11 2:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-12 13:55 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-12 16:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-12 18:26 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-07 20:33 ` Neil Horman
2011-09-07 20:48 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-07 21:18 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-09-07 21:27 ` Stephan Mueller
2011-09-07 21:38 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-09-08 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-09-08 11:48 ` Steve Grubb
2011-09-08 16:13 ` David Miller
2011-09-09 19:08 ` Eric Paris
2011-09-09 19:12 ` Neil Horman
2011-09-08 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07 21:20 ` Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
2011-09-08 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-12 14:02 ` Jarod Wilson
2011-09-12 14:58 ` Neil Horman
2011-09-12 17:06 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110908084420.GC4032@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert.xu@redhat.com \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=stephan.mueller@atsec.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).