From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/22] staging: crypto: skein: allow building statically Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:52:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20140317215252.GA24150@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Cooper Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48592 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751757AbaCQVuv (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:50:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 09:32:35PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote: > These are the minimum changes required to get the code to build > statically in the kernel. It's necessary to do this first so that we > can empirically determine that future cleanup patches aren't changing > the generated object code. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper This doesn't apply to my latest tree :( > --- a/drivers/staging/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/staging/Makefile > @@ -65,3 +65,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XILLYBUS) += xillybus/ > obj-$(CONFIG_DGNC) += dgnc/ > obj-$(CONFIG_DGAP) += dgap/ > obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_SPINAND_MT29F) += mt29f_spinand/ > +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_SKEIN) += skein/ Care to align these up with the way this file is formatted? And I have no objection to taking the drivers/staging/ patches, the script looks useful, but I can't take it through the staging tree, sorry. thanks, greg k-h