From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"steve.capper@linaro.org" <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 01/15] asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 15:31:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140506143120.GD23957@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398959381-8126-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:49:33PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Switch the default unaligned access method to 'hardware implemented'
> if HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/unaligned.h | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
I'm happy to take this patch via the arm64 tree. But arm is affected as
well, so it would be good to know if Russell has any objections (cc'ed).
Patch below for reference. Thanks.
Catalin
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h b/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h
> index 03cf5936bad6..1ac097279db1 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h
> @@ -4,22 +4,27 @@
> /*
> * This is the most generic implementation of unaligned accesses
> * and should work almost anywhere.
> - *
> - * If an architecture can handle unaligned accesses in hardware,
> - * it may want to use the linux/unaligned/access_ok.h implementation
> - * instead.
> */
> #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>
> +/* Set by the arch if it can handle unaligned accesses in hardware. */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> +# include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
> +#endif
> +
> #if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
> -# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
> -# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
> +# ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> +# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
> +# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
> +# endif
> # include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
> # define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
> # define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
> #elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
> -# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
> -# include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
> +# ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> +# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
> +# include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
> +# endif
> # include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
> # define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be
> # define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_be
> --
> 1.8.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-06 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-01 15:49 [PATCH resend 00/15] arm64 crypto roundup Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 01/15] asm-generic: allow generic unaligned access if the arch supports it Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-06 14:31 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-05-06 14:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-06 15:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 02/15] arm64: add abstractions for FPSIMD state manipulation Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-06 14:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-06 14:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-06 15:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-06 15:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 03/15] arm64: defer reloading a task's FPSIMD state to userland resume Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-06 16:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-06 16:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-06 16:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 04/15] arm64: add support for kernel mode NEON in interrupt context Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-06 16:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-06 17:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 05/15] arm64/crypto: SHA-1 using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 06/15] arm64/crypto: SHA-224/SHA-256 " Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 07/15] arm64/crypto: GHASH secure hash " Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 08/15] arm64/crypto: AES " Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-01 15:49 ` [PATCH resend 09/15] arm64/crypto: AES in CCM mode " Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-07 14:45 ` [PATCH resend 00/15] arm64 crypto roundup Catalin Marinas
2014-05-07 19:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-08 11:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-08 21:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09 6:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-05-14 1:29 ` Herbert Xu
2014-05-14 8:47 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140506143120.GD23957@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).