From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64/crypto: add voluntary preemption to Crypto Extensions SHA1 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 09:57:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20140516085748.GD5624@arm.com> References: <1400091451-9117-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1400091451-9117-10-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20140515172458.GE1499@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi" , "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" To: Ard Biesheuvel Return-path: Received: from fw-tnat.austin.arm.com ([217.140.110.23]:41448 "EHLO collaborate-mta1.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755619AbaEPI63 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 04:58:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:10:20PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 15 May 2014 14:47, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > For the time being I would drop the last 4 patches. We can revisit them > > for the next kernel version. > > Agreed. > > Should I send an updated pull request? As it's not a signed tag anyway, I can merge up to the relevant commit. -- Catalin