Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
Subject: [QUESTION] Crypto queue handling
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 17:58:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201405261758.19425.marex@denx.de> (raw)

Hello,

I'm digging in crypto/algapi.c , in the crypto_enqueue_request() function. I 
don't quite understand how the backlog mechanism should work. According to [1], 
I suspect it should limit the amount of requests in the queue to $max_qlen and 
allow one more request to be enqueued into the $backlog ; and if there is more 
requests than $max_qlen, it should start dropping the requests ?

Inspecting the code, I see these situations:
1) qlen < max_qlen
   -> The request is enqueued, qlen is increased , returns -EINPROGRESS
2) qlen >= max_qlen
   -> The crypto_enqueue_request() returns -EBUSY in this case
   2a) request->flags has CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG unset
       => Request is not enqueued , qlen is not increased
   2b) request->flags has CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG set
       => Request is enqueued , qlen is increased

Therefore, I suspect if 2b) case happens repeatedly, the queue will grow 
indefinitelly. I'm not sure if this can happen, but I suspect that's really 
possible. My understanding is that the driver will call crypto_enqueue_request() 
and propagate it's return value to the upper layers. They upper layet can 
generate such a request that has CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG set .

But how shall the upper layers handle the -EBUSY return value from the crypto 
API calls? Shall they stop saturating the crypto API with requests ? How can the 
upper layers determine when can they resume sending crypto requests ? Shall they 
just try calling crypto_enqueue_request() again to see if it still returns -
EBUSY ?

Sorry if this is an obvious question and thanks for the help!

[1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi/735

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

             reply	other threads:[~2014-05-26 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-26 15:58 Marek Vasut [this message]
2014-05-26 16:16 ` [QUESTION] Crypto queue handling Marek Vasut
2014-05-30  9:56   ` Herbert Xu
2014-05-30  9:30 ` Herbert Xu
2014-05-30 13:33   ` Hsieh, Che-Min
2014-05-30 13:41     ` Herbert Xu
     [not found]       ` <CAH=tA9E0h04HP70S8Ua4nYxZ=7ncmYe=wjNK=y5jSoY52Xrrug@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-12  4:10         ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201405261758.19425.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=panto@antoniou-consulting.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox