From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Leonidas S. Barbosa" Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Enabling VMX module for PPC64 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:41:39 -0200 Message-ID: <20150206164139.GA13760@bluepex.com> References: <20150205172126.GA15218@bluepex.com> <1423173503.32511.16.camel@x220> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Bolle Return-path: Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com ([32.104.18.24]:50732 "EHLO e24smtp03.br.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757609AbbBFQlq (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:41:46 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:41:44 -0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423173503.32511.16.camel@x220> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thanks for the advices Paul. Resending patch set as V2. > > +vmx-crypto-objs := vmx.o aesp8-ppc.o ghashp8-ppc.o aes.o aes_cbc.o aes_ctr.o ghash.o > > + > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC64),y) > > Can this test ever fail? In fact we don't need this first IF, since it already depends on PPC64. --- Leonidas.