From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hash import/export
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 23:10:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151011221039.GA10037@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151011193427.GI32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 08:34:27PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Herbert,
>
> I wonder if you can clear something up about the hash export/import
> functionality. In:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-May/344120.html
>
> you seem to imply that the exported and imported state can't be defined
> by the driver.
>
> Boris tells me, "AFAIR, crypto users are expecting md5/sha1/sha256_state
> depending on the crypto req state they are exporting".
>
> From what I can see, there is only one place in the core crypto code
> where hash state is exported and imported, and that's in hash_accept(),
> and that's always done with the same driver. The only other place is
> in the marvell cesa driver itself when initialising the hmac state.
>
> Is there any reason a driver can't define its own structure to be
> exported here which can be shared between each of the different methods
> it supports?
A further question: it looks like struct md5_state's hash member is
always supposed to be in little endian format, whereas struct
sha*_state's state is always big endian format. Is there a reason
why these are typed 'u32', rather than __le32 and __be32?
This would make the intention here more obvious, and should also allow
the opportunity for sparse to verify that we're getting the endianness
correct everywhere.
Thanks.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-11 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-11 19:34 hash import/export Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-11 19:38 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-11 22:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-10-12 1:44 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151011221039.GA10037@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox