From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Royce <nroycea+kernel@gmail.com>,
"# v4 . 10 . x : 07de4bc88c crypto : s5p-sss - Fix completing"
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion on LRW(AES)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:48:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309104811.GH7185@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308211420.5372-1-krzk@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:14:20PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Running TCRYPT with LRW compiled causes spinlock recursion:
>
> testing speed of async lrw(aes) (lrw(ecb-aes-s5p)) encryption
> tcrypt: test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 19007 operations in 1 seconds (304112 bytes)
> tcrypt: test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 15753 operations in 1 seconds (1008192 bytes)
> tcrypt: test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 14293 operations in 1 seconds (3659008 bytes)
> tcrypt: test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11906 operations in 1 seconds (12191744 bytes)
> tcrypt: test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks):
> BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#1, irq/84-10830000/89
> lock: 0xeea99a68, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: irq/84-10830000/89, .owner_cpu: 1
> CPU: 1 PID: 89 Comm: irq/84-10830000 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1-00001-g897ca6d0800d #559
> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
> [<c010e1ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010ae1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c010ae1c>] (show_stack) from [<c03449c0>] (dump_stack+0x78/0x8c)
> [<c03449c0>] (dump_stack) from [<c015de68>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x11c/0x120)
> [<c015de68>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c0720110>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x20/0x28)
> [<c0720110>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c0572ca0>] (s5p_aes_crypt+0x2c/0xb4)
> [<c0572ca0>] (s5p_aes_crypt) from [<bf1d8aa4>] (do_encrypt+0x78/0xb0 [lrw])
> [<bf1d8aa4>] (do_encrypt [lrw]) from [<bf1d8b00>] (encrypt_done+0x24/0x54 [lrw])
> [<bf1d8b00>] (encrypt_done [lrw]) from [<c05732a0>] (s5p_aes_complete+0x60/0xcc)
> [<c05732a0>] (s5p_aes_complete) from [<c0573440>] (s5p_aes_interrupt+0x134/0x1a0)
> [<c0573440>] (s5p_aes_interrupt) from [<c01667c4>] (irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x54)
> [<c01667c4>] (irq_thread_fn) from [<c0166a98>] (irq_thread+0x12c/0x1e0)
> [<c0166a98>] (irq_thread) from [<c0136a28>] (kthread+0x108/0x138)
> [<c0136a28>] (kthread) from [<c0107778>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
>
> Interrupt handling routine was calling req->base.complete() under
> spinlock. In most cases this wasn't fatal but when combined with some
> of the cipher modes (like LRW) this caused recursion - starting the new
> encryption (s5p_aes_crypt()) while still holding the spinlock from
> previous round (s5p_aes_complete()).
>
> Beside that, the s5p_aes_interrupt() error handling path could execute
> two completions in case of error for RX and TX blocks.
>
> Rewrite the interrupt handling routine and the completion by:
>
> 1. Splitting the operations on scatterlist copies from
> s5p_aes_complete() into separate s5p_sg_done(). This still should be
> done under lock.
> The s5p_aes_complete() now only calls req->base.complete() and it has
> to be called outside of lock.
>
> 2. Moving the s5p_aes_complete() out of spinlock critical sections.
> In interrupt service routine s5p_aes_interrupts(), it appeared in few
> places, including error paths inside other functions called from ISR.
> This code was not so obvious to read so simplify it by putting the
> s5p_aes_complete() only within ISR level.
>
> Reported-by: Nathan Royce <nroycea+kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10.x: 07de4bc88c crypto: s5p-sss - Fix completing
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10.x
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Patch applied. Thanks.
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 21:14 [PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion on LRW(AES) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-03-09 10:48 ` Herbert Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170309104811.GH7185@gondor.apana.org.au \
--to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=nroycea+kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox