Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nathan Royce <nroycea+kernel@gmail.com>,
	"# v4 . 10 . x : 07de4bc88c crypto : s5p-sss - Fix completing"
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion on LRW(AES)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:48:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309104811.GH7185@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308211420.5372-1-krzk@kernel.org>

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:14:20PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Running TCRYPT with LRW compiled causes spinlock recursion:
> 
>     testing speed of async lrw(aes) (lrw(ecb-aes-s5p)) encryption
>     tcrypt: test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 19007 operations in 1 seconds (304112 bytes)
>     tcrypt: test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 15753 operations in 1 seconds (1008192 bytes)
>     tcrypt: test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 14293 operations in 1 seconds (3659008 bytes)
>     tcrypt: test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11906 operations in 1 seconds (12191744 bytes)
>     tcrypt: test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks):
>     BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#1, irq/84-10830000/89
>      lock: 0xeea99a68, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: irq/84-10830000/89, .owner_cpu: 1
>     CPU: 1 PID: 89 Comm: irq/84-10830000 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1-00001-g897ca6d0800d #559
>     Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>     [<c010e1ec>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010ae1c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>     [<c010ae1c>] (show_stack) from [<c03449c0>] (dump_stack+0x78/0x8c)
>     [<c03449c0>] (dump_stack) from [<c015de68>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x11c/0x120)
>     [<c015de68>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c0720110>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x20/0x28)
>     [<c0720110>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c0572ca0>] (s5p_aes_crypt+0x2c/0xb4)
>     [<c0572ca0>] (s5p_aes_crypt) from [<bf1d8aa4>] (do_encrypt+0x78/0xb0 [lrw])
>     [<bf1d8aa4>] (do_encrypt [lrw]) from [<bf1d8b00>] (encrypt_done+0x24/0x54 [lrw])
>     [<bf1d8b00>] (encrypt_done [lrw]) from [<c05732a0>] (s5p_aes_complete+0x60/0xcc)
>     [<c05732a0>] (s5p_aes_complete) from [<c0573440>] (s5p_aes_interrupt+0x134/0x1a0)
>     [<c0573440>] (s5p_aes_interrupt) from [<c01667c4>] (irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x54)
>     [<c01667c4>] (irq_thread_fn) from [<c0166a98>] (irq_thread+0x12c/0x1e0)
>     [<c0166a98>] (irq_thread) from [<c0136a28>] (kthread+0x108/0x138)
>     [<c0136a28>] (kthread) from [<c0107778>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
> 
> Interrupt handling routine was calling req->base.complete() under
> spinlock.  In most cases this wasn't fatal but when combined with some
> of the cipher modes (like LRW) this caused recursion - starting the new
> encryption (s5p_aes_crypt()) while still holding the spinlock from
> previous round (s5p_aes_complete()).
> 
> Beside that, the s5p_aes_interrupt() error handling path could execute
> two completions in case of error for RX and TX blocks.
> 
> Rewrite the interrupt handling routine and the completion by:
> 
> 1. Splitting the operations on scatterlist copies from
>    s5p_aes_complete() into separate s5p_sg_done(). This still should be
>    done under lock.
>    The s5p_aes_complete() now only calls req->base.complete() and it has
>    to be called outside of lock.
> 
> 2. Moving the s5p_aes_complete() out of spinlock critical sections.
>    In interrupt service routine s5p_aes_interrupts(), it appeared in few
>    places, including error paths inside other functions called from ISR.
>    This code was not so obvious to read so simplify it by putting the
>    s5p_aes_complete() only within ISR level.
> 
> Reported-by: Nathan Royce <nroycea+kernel@gmail.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10.x: 07de4bc88c crypto: s5p-sss - Fix completing
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10.x
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Patch applied.  Thanks.
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08 21:14 [PATCH] crypto: s5p-sss - Fix spinlock recursion on LRW(AES) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-03-09 10:48 ` Herbert Xu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170309104811.GH7185@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=nroycea+kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox