From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] x86/crypto: Fix RBP usage in several crypto .S
 files
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:15:34 +0200
Message-ID: <20170907071534.ztbxvyfoo7m7esmw@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1504029132.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <20170902000919.GA139193@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
        Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>,
        Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170902000919.GA139193@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org


* Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for fixing these!  I don't have time to review these in detail, but I ran
> the crypto self-tests on the affected algorithms, and they all pass.  I also
> benchmarked them before and after; the only noticable performance difference was
> that sha256-avx2 and sha512-avx2 became a few percent slower.  I don't suppose
> there is a way around that?  Otherwise it's probably not a big deal.

Which CPU model did you use for the test?

Thanks,

	Ingo