From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tobin C. Harding" Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ccree: Fix bool comparison Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:17:08 +1100 Message-ID: <20171016211708.GM16106@eros> References: <1508148491-11837-1-git-send-email-sunil.m@techveda.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, karthik@techveda.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org To: sunil.m@techveda.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1508148491-11837-1-git-send-email-sunil.m@techveda.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:38:11PM +0530, sunil.m@techveda.org wrote: > From: Suniel Mahesh > > Bool tests don't need comparisons. This commit log could be a bit longer. You may like to read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst (section 2). > This fixes the following coccinelle warning: > WARNING: Comparison of bool to 0/1 > > Signed-off-by: Suniel Mahesh > --- > Note: > - Patch was tested and built(ARCH=arm) on latest > linux-next. Building is _not_ testing. > - No build issues reported, however it was not > tested on real hardware. This is implicit if you state 'builds on ARM' > - Please discard this changeset, if this is not > helping the code look better. This is implicit also ;) > --- > drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_request_mgr.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_request_mgr.c b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_request_mgr.c > index 2e0df57..942afe2 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_request_mgr.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_request_mgr.c > @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ int send_request( > unsigned int max_required_seq_len = (total_seq_len + > ((ssi_req->ivgen_dma_addr_len == 0) ? 0 : > SSI_IVPOOL_SEQ_LEN) + > - ((is_dout == 0) ? 1 : 0)); > + (!is_dout ? 1 : 0)); Perhaps - ((is_dout == 0) ? 1 : 0)); + (is_dout ? 0 : 1) Good luck, Tobin.