From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
gregory.clement@free-electrons.com,
miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com, oferh@marvell.com,
igall@marvell.com, nadavh@marvell.com,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] crypto: inside-secure - only update the result buffer when provided
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:49:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211074957.GC25616@kwain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211072946.GA8823@gondor.apana.org.au>
Hi Herbert,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:29:46PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:05:17AM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> >
> > if (sreq->finish)
> > result_sz = crypto_ahash_digestsize(ahash);
> > - memcpy(sreq->state, areq->result, result_sz);
> > +
> > + /* The called isn't required to supply a result buffer. Updated it only
> > + * when provided.
> > + */
> > + if (areq->result)
> > + memcpy(sreq->state, areq->result, result_sz);
>
> I don't think you should use whether areq->result is NULL to
> determine whether to copy data into it. For example, I could
> be making an update call with a non-NULL areq->result and it would
> be completely wrong if you overwrote that with the above memcpy.
>
> IOW areq->result should not be touched at all unless you are doing
> a finalisation.
I didn't know that. It means the SafeXcel driver logic is wrong
regarding this point, as areq->result is DMA mapped and used of all hash
operations (including updates).
So this patch is indeed fixing an issue, which should probably not be
there in the first place. I guess you recommend using a buffer local to
the driver instead, and only update areq->request on completion (final).
Thanks!
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 9:05 [PATCH 0/4] crypto: inside-secure - set of fixes Antoine Tenart
2017-11-28 9:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] crypto: inside-secure - per request invalidation Antoine Tenart
2017-11-28 9:14 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-11-28 9:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] crypto: inside-secure - free requests even if their handling failed Antoine Tenart
2017-11-28 9:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] crypto: inside-secure - only update the result buffer when provided Antoine Tenart
2017-12-11 7:29 ` Herbert Xu
2017-12-11 7:49 ` Antoine Tenart [this message]
2017-12-11 11:13 ` Herbert Xu
2017-11-28 9:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] crypto: inside-secure - fix request allocations in invalidation path Antoine Tenart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211074957.GC25616@kwain \
--to=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=igall@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=oferh@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).