Linux cryptographic layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	julia.lawall@lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: Use zeroing memory allocator instead of allocator/memset
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 22:16:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171231164623.GA2709@himanshu-Vostro-3559> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1514735169.1967.13.camel@perches.com>

On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 07:46:09AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-12-31 at 17:54 +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> > Use dma_zalloc_coherent for allocating zeroed
> > memory and remove unnecessary memset function.
> > 
> > Done using Coccinelle.
> > Generated-by: scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/kzalloc-simple.cocci
> 
> I thought you were going to change this tag to
> not use the "-by:" form and use something else
> like "generated-using:" or "created-with:".

Thanks for pointing that out!

I was going to ask this to Julia for the appropriate tag, but it slipped
my mind. In future I will definitely choose more appropriate tag
on the Coccinelle patches.

Just to give an insight of the problem to everyone :

While running checkpatch on patches involving the above Generated-by
tag, which is generally used to specify the cocci script used,
checkpatch prompts the below warning and error :

WARNING: Non-standard signature: Generated-by:
#10:
Generated-by: scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/kzalloc-simple.cocci

ERROR: Unrecognized email address:
'scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/kzalloc-simple.cocci'

Joe suggested to not use the "-by:" form since it should be reserved
for actual people's names and email addresses.
And if you use other tag than the "-by:" tag, then there is no
error/warning produced.

Thanks
Himanshu Jha

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-31 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-31 12:24 [PATCH] crypto: Use zeroing memory allocator instead of allocator/memset Himanshu Jha
2017-12-31 15:46 ` Joe Perches
2017-12-31 16:46   ` Himanshu Jha [this message]
2017-12-31 17:10     ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-12 12:23 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171231164623.GA2709@himanshu-Vostro-3559 \
    --to=himanshujha199640@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox