From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
qat-linux@intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
Lars Persson <larper@axis.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Rabin Vincent <rabinv@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 07/11] crypto: xcbc: Remove VLA usage
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:47:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180621004715.GI111712@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJ30eGUoik5+fWgdSHcO7NrAi87LXWWA5=RX6zwK0ueVg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 05:10:04PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:04:04PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this uses
> >> the maximum blocksize and adds a sanity check.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >> ---
> >> crypto/xcbc.c | 5 ++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/crypto/xcbc.c b/crypto/xcbc.c
> >> index 25c75af50d3f..016481b1f3ba 100644
> >> --- a/crypto/xcbc.c
> >> +++ b/crypto/xcbc.c
> >> @@ -65,7 +65,10 @@ static int crypto_xcbc_digest_setkey(struct crypto_shash *parent,
> >> int bs = crypto_shash_blocksize(parent);
> >> u8 *consts = PTR_ALIGN(&ctx->ctx[0], alignmask + 1);
> >> int err = 0;
> >> - u8 key1[bs];
> >> + u8 key1[CRYPTO_ALG_MAX_BLOCKSIZE];
> >> +
> >> + if (WARN_ON(bs > sizeof(key1)))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Similarly, why not MAX_CIPHER_BLOCKSIZE?
> >
> > Also, xcbc_create() only allows a 16-byte block size, and you made the API
> > enforce the maximum for algorithms anyway. So I think the extra check here
> > isn't very worthwhile.
>
> Is the "parent" argument in crypto_xcbc_digest_setkey() always going
> to be the "alg" from xcbc_create()? I couldn't convince myself that
> was true. If it is, then yes, this VLA can trivially made to be 16,
> but it seemed like they were separate instances...
Yes, it's guaranteed to be an instance of "xcbc" which was created by
xcbc_create(), so it will have 'cra_blocksize == 16'.
So until someone actually tests and enables support in the "xcbc" template for
other block sizes (if the XCBC specification allows them), it would also be fine
to just '#define XCBC_BLOCK_SIZE 16' at the top of the file and use that
everywhere that references the block size.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 19:03 [PATCH 00/11] crypto: Remove VLA usage Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] crypto: shash: " Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2018-06-20 20:36 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-20 20:39 ` Christophe LEROY
2018-06-20 20:42 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] dm integrity: " Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 03/11] crypto: ahash: " Kees Cook
2018-06-20 20:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 04/11] dm verity fec: " Kees Cook
2018-06-20 23:33 ` [dm-devel] " Eric Biggers
2018-06-20 23:44 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-21 2:30 ` Herbert Xu
2018-06-21 20:19 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 05/11] crypto alg: Introduce max blocksize and alignmask Kees Cook
2018-06-20 23:40 ` [dm-devel] " Eric Biggers
2018-06-21 0:04 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-21 0:32 ` Eric Biggers
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 06/11] crypto: cbc: Remove VLA usage Kees Cook
2018-06-20 20:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2018-06-20 23:42 ` [dm-devel] " Eric Biggers
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 07/11] crypto: xcbc: " Kees Cook
2018-06-20 23:46 ` [dm-devel] " Eric Biggers
2018-06-21 0:10 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-21 0:47 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 08/11] crypto: qat: " Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 09/11] crypto: shash: Remove VLA usage in unaligned hashing Kees Cook
2018-06-20 23:57 ` Eric Biggers
2018-06-21 0:15 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 10/11] crypto: ahash: Remove VLA usage for AHASH_REQUEST_ON_STACK Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 11/11] crypto: skcipher: Remove VLA usage for SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK Kees Cook
2018-06-20 19:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-20 20:38 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-20 20:22 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180621004715.GI111712@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=larper@axis.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qat-linux@intel.com \
--cc=rabinv@axis.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).