From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: testmgr: add test vectors for skein Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 11:47:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20180701094719.GC9956@kroah.com> References: <20180620105714.18359-1-j.m.torrespalma@gmail.com> <20180620181051.GC76265@gmail.com> <20180620221247.GA25379@randy-betty> <20180701091611.z24lln7cyho6ktlb@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Juan Manuel Torres Palma , Eric Biggers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180701091611.z24lln7cyho6ktlb@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:16:11PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:12:47AM +0900, Juan Manuel Torres Palma wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:10:51AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > Also, can you describe the users of Skein in the kernel? If there are no users, > > > there's no need to move it out of staging, or even have it in the kernel at all > > > anymore. I say that as someone who has had to volunteer to fix critical bugs > > > found by fuzzing in crypto algorithms for which it's unclear why they are in the > > > kernel at all, as there are no apparent users. > > > > To be honest I'm not aware of anyone actually using Skein. > > > > So by this are you suggesting that we drop support? If not removed, I believe > > it's better to use test vectors as regression tests for further modifications. > > Let's just remove skein. In fact staging should never add generic > crypto algorithms. Ok, I'll go drop it. I forgot why we added it in the first place, it has been there for 4 years and not moved out, so it's not a problem to drop it now. thanks, greg k-h