From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A366C43603 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 03:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DA92077B for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 03:31:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576035073; bh=dA0Xef0QUmlZ+r0pHhzospDvrRyZ+MDNb2N1fvRIu74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=yL4bq4UeI1WNtU04Njr4EBnnXYgl3EyzLqbnwbSuXRhwFQXZAShBJKtAnajmOHUCY U2X/bhZQXPlMnFxfU2uK/9h/v6L4dCpXnQ418l7/UkFjcbfq+EXVHskY6J/PF5FCZs tY0qmfyoDoNcP1JGjpo37BaYNwRJlm1VcXYkvttw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727119AbfLKDbM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:31:12 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60602 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726642AbfLKDbM (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:31:12 -0500 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-24-5-143-220.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 864EB2073B; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 03:31:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576035071; bh=dA0Xef0QUmlZ+r0pHhzospDvrRyZ+MDNb2N1fvRIu74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GdSyi0EynEDQ1W8SxkWpAzK3bbsWxl461zryQYGtU9WMBtUnO4a3QeiHV+I0laVOj ZUuKNP164ozvdh54Jr/i4VDo8m2nbdL+NOvwXonSmwbRp8onlMC2vULidCXur9dy9m 3BWKkH49qKklYGdW1STzhJLXci6f/GsnOz0RRX0Y= Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 19:31:10 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Herbert Xu Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/3] crypto: padlock-sha - Use init_tfm/exit_tfm interface Message-ID: <20191211033110.GE732@sol.localdomain> References: <20191208054229.h4smagmiuqhxxc6w@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 01:42:52PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > @@ -231,6 +225,8 @@ static struct shash_alg sha1_alg = { > .final = padlock_sha1_final, > .export = padlock_sha_export, > .import = padlock_sha_import, > + .init_tfm = padlock_cra_init, > + .exit_tfm = padlock_cra_exit, > .descsize = sizeof(struct padlock_sha_desc), > .statesize = sizeof(struct sha1_state), Nit: these should be renamed to padlock_sha_init_tfm() and padlock_sha_exit_tfm(). - Eric