linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Open code .arch_extension
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:18:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423111803.GG4808@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422180027.GH3585@gaia>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1587 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:50:38AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Since BTI is a mandatory feature of v8.5 there is no BTI arch_extension,
> > you can only enable it by moving the base architecture to v8.5.  You'd
> > need to use .arch and that feels likely to find us sharp edges to run
> > into.

> For MTE, .arch armv8-a+memtag won't work since this is only available
> with armv8.5-a. My preference would be to have the highest arch version
> supported by the kernel in the assembler.h file, i.e. ".arch armv8.5-a"
> followed by .arch_extension in each .S file, as needed.

I think we decided that .arch_extension was too new to be used for
things like the crypto stuff where we still support older toolchains?

> Forcing .S files to armv8.5 would not cause any problems with
> the base armv8.0 that the kernel image support since it shouldn't change
> the opcodes gas generates. The .S files would use alternatives anyway
> (or simply have code not called).

We do loose the checking that the assembler does that nobody used a
newer feature by mistake but yeah, shouldn't affect the output.

> The inline asm is slightly more problematic, especially with the clang
> builtin assembler which goes in a single pass. But we could do something
> similar to what we did with the LSE atomics and raising the base of the
> inline asm to armv8.5 (or 8.6 etc., whatever we need in the future).

FWIW I did something different to this for BTI so I wasn't using the
instructions directly so I was going to abandon this series.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25 11:41 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Open code .arch_extension Mark Brown
2020-03-25 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: asm: Provide macro to control enabling architecture extensions Mark Brown
2020-03-25 11:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: lib: Use ARM64_EXTENSIONS() Mark Brown
2020-03-25 11:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: crypto: " Mark Brown
2020-03-25 11:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Open code .arch_extension Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-25 11:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-25 11:54     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-25 12:01       ` Mark Brown
2020-03-25 12:03       ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-25 12:24         ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-22 18:00     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-23 11:18       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2020-04-23 11:59         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-23 13:40           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-25 12:31 ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-25 13:26   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-25 13:30     ` Mark Brown
2020-03-25 13:27   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200423111803.GG4808@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).