linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	syzbot <syzbot+2e635807decef724a1fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: DRBG - always try to free Jitter RNG instance
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:21:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200605162149.GE1373@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4575667.y41LbVH5lo@tauon.chronox.de>

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:52:57AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. Juni 2020, 08:16:46 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers:
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 07:58:15AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 5. Juni 2020, 02:43:36 CEST schrieb Eric Biggers:
> > > 
> > > Hi Eric,
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:41:00AM +0200, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > > > > The Jitter RNG is unconditionally allocated as a seed source follwoing
> > > > > the patch 97f2650e5040. Thus, the instance must always be deallocated.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+2e635807decef724a1fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > > Fixes: 97f2650e5040 ("crypto: drbg - always seeded with SP800-90B
> > > > > ...")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  crypto/drbg.c | 3 +++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/crypto/drbg.c b/crypto/drbg.c
> > > > > index 37526eb8c5d5..8a0f16950144 100644
> > > > > --- a/crypto/drbg.c
> > > > > +++ b/crypto/drbg.c
> > > > > @@ -1631,6 +1631,9 @@ static int drbg_uninstantiate(struct drbg_state
> > > > > *drbg)>
> > > > > 
> > > > >  	if (drbg->random_ready.func) {
> > > > >  	
> > > > >  		del_random_ready_callback(&drbg->random_ready);
> > > > >  		cancel_work_sync(&drbg->seed_work);
> > > > > 
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drbg->jent)) {
> > > > > 
> > > > >  		crypto_free_rng(drbg->jent);
> > > > >  		drbg->jent = NULL;
> > > > >  	
> > > > >  	}
> > > > 
> > > > It it okay that ->jent can be left as an ERR_PTR() value?
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps it should always be set to NULL?
> > > 
> > > The error value is used in the drbg_instantiate function. There it is
> > > checked whether -ENOENT (i.e. the cipher is not available) or any other
> > > error is present. I am not sure we should move that check.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the review.
> > 
> > drbg_seed() and drbg_async_seed() check for drbg->jent being NULL.
> > 
> > Will that now break due it drbg->jent possibly being an ERR_PTR()?
> > 
> > Hence why I'm asking whether drbg_uninstantiate() should set it to NULL.
> 
> The allocation happens in drbg_prepare_hrng that is only invoked by 
> drbg_instantiate.
> 
> drbg_instantiate checks for the ERR_PTR and sets it to NULL in case the error 
> is deemed ok.
> 
> Thus, any subsequent functions would see either a valid pointer or NULL. The 
> only exception is drbg_uninstantiate when invoked from the error case 
> 
>                 ret = drbg_prepare_hrng(drbg);
>                 if (ret)
>                         goto free_everything;
> 
> Thus, I think that the two functions you mention will never see any values 
> other than NULL or a valid pointer.
> 

To be concrete, I'm suggesting:

	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drbg->jent))
		crypto_free_rng(drbg->jent);
	drbg->jent = NULL;

This would be similar to how drbg_dealloc_state() sets lots of other fields of
the drbg_state to NULL.

It's your call though.  I haven't properly read this code; the above is just
what makes sense to me at first glance...

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-05 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03  3:41 memory leak in crypto_create_tfm syzbot
2020-06-03  3:55 ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-03  8:08 ` [PATCH] crypto: DRBG - always try to free Jitter RNG instance Stephan Müller
2020-06-03 11:09   ` Dan Carpenter
2020-06-03 11:40     ` Stephan Mueller
2020-06-04  6:41     ` [PATCH v2] " Stephan Müller
2020-06-05  0:43       ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-05  5:58         ` Stephan Mueller
2020-06-05  6:16           ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-05  6:52             ` Stephan Mueller
2020-06-05 16:21               ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-06-07 13:07                 ` Stephan Müller
2020-06-07 13:20       ` [PATCH v3] " Stephan Müller
2020-06-12  6:49         ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200605162149.GE1373@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smueller@chronox.de \
    --cc=syzbot+2e635807decef724a1fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).