linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KEYS: Double max_size to make keyctl pkey_verify work
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 06:34:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220203033452.ft57ma5gj6cb7zhm@altlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c9d973f-847e-e8bc-95fb-6c98a98a02e6@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 10:15:24PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> 
> On 2/2/22 01:59, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> > Rarely used `keyctl pkey_verify' can verify raw signatures, but was
> > failing, because ECDSA/EC-RDSA signature sizes are twice key sizes which
> > does not pass in/out sizes check in keyctl_pkey_params_get_2.
> > This in turn because these values cannot be distinguished by a single
> > `max_size' callback return value.
> > Also, `keyctl pkey_query` displays incorrect `max_sig_size' about these
> > algorithms.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
> > ---
> >   crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c
> > index 4fefb219bfdc..3ffbab07ed2a 100644
> > --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c
> > +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c
> > @@ -143,8 +143,19 @@ static int software_key_query(const struct kernel_pkey_params *params,
> >   	len = crypto_akcipher_maxsize(tfm);
> >   	info->key_size = len * 8;
> > -	info->max_data_size = len;
> > -	info->max_sig_size = len;
> > +	if (strcmp(alg_name, "ecrdsa") == 0 ||
> > +	    strncmp(alg_name, "ecdsa-", 6) == 0) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For these algos sig size is twice key size.
> > +		 * keyctl uses max_sig_size as minimum input size, and
> > +		 * max_data_size as minimum output size for a signature.
> > +		 */
> > +		info->max_data_size = len * 2;
> > +		info->max_sig_size = len * 2;
> I don't know about the data size but following my tests this is not enough
> for ECDSA signature size. In ECDSA case the r and s components of the
> signature are encode in asn.1, not 'raw'. So there are 2 bytes at the
> beginning for sequence identifier , 2 bytes asn.1 for the r component, 1
> additional 0-byte to make the r component always a positive number, then the
> r component, then 2 bytes asn.1 for the s component, 1 addition 0-byte to
> make the s component a positive number, then the s component. Phew.
> 
> info->max_sig_size = 2 + (2 + 1 + len) * 2;
> 
> so for NIST P384 it's: 2 + (2+1+48) * 2 = 104
> 
> Then it works for me as well.

Well, another solution, without changing API, is that max_size() should
return bigger size (to fit encoded signature), but in that case keyctl
will think wrongly about key_size.

Just for reference, keyctl_pkey_params_get_2 check that needs to be
passed:

        case KEYCTL_PKEY_VERIFY:
                if (uparams.in_len  > info.max_sig_size ||
                    uparams.out_len > info.max_data_size)
                        return -EINVAL;

So we can return arbitrarily big value, in theory.

Thanks,

> 
> 
> > +	} else {
> > +		info->max_data_size = len;
> > +		info->max_sig_size = len;
> > +	}
> >   	info->max_enc_size = len;
> >   	info->max_dec_size = len;
> >   	info->supported_ops = (KEYCTL_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPT |

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-03  3:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-02  6:59 [RFC PATCH] KEYS: Double max_size to make keyctl pkey_verify work Vitaly Chikunov
2022-02-02 12:55 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-02 21:24   ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-02-02 22:38     ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-02-03  3:42       ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-03  0:07     ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-02-20 23:31   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-02-03  3:15 ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-03  3:34   ` Vitaly Chikunov [this message]
2022-02-20 23:29   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-02-21  2:43     ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-02-25 19:47       ` Stefan Berger
2022-02-20 23:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220203033452.ft57ma5gj6cb7zhm@altlinux.org \
    --to=vt@altlinux.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).