From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Servers)" <elliott@hpe.com>
Cc: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>,
"linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86/sha256 - autoload if SHA-NI detected
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 20:22:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231101032202.GA1830@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW5PR84MB1842C4652CCCB7738AE7FA4BABA0A@MW5PR84MB1842.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:52:53PM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Servers) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 8:19 AM
> > To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86/sha256 - autoload if SHA-NI detected
> >
> > On 29/10/2023 06:15, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > >
> > > The x86 SHA-256 module contains four implementations: SSSE3, AVX, AVX2,
> > > and SHA-NI. Commit 1c43c0f1f84a ("crypto: x86/sha - load modules based
> > > on CPU features") made the module be autoloaded when SSSE3, AVX, or AVX2
> > > is detected. The omission of SHA-NI appears to be an oversight, perhaps
> > > because of the outdated file-level comment. This patch fixes this,
> > > though in practice this makes no difference because SSSE3 is a subset of
> > > the other three features anyway. Indeed, sha256_ni_transform() executes
> > > SSSE3 instructions such as pshufb.
> > >
> > > Cc: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> >
> > Indeed, it was an oversight.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Roxana Nicolescu <roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/crypto/sha256_ssse3_glue.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256_ssse3_glue.c
> > b/arch/x86/crypto/sha256_ssse3_glue.c
> > > index 4c0383a90e11..a135cf9baca3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/crypto/sha256_ssse3_glue.c
> ...
> > >
> > > static const struct x86_cpu_id module_cpu_ids[] = {
> > > + X86_MATCH_FEATURE(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI, NULL),
>
> Unless something else has changed, this needs to be inside ifdefs, as discovered
> in the proposed patch series last year:
>
> for sha1_sse3_glue.c:
> #ifdef CONFIG_AS_SHA1_NI
> X86_MATCH_FEATURE(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI, NULL),
> #endif
>
> for sha256_sse3_glue.c:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AS_SHA256_NI
> + X86_MATCH_FEATURE(X86_FEATURE_SHA_NI, NULL),
> +#endif
Right, thanks for pointing that out. It compiles either way, but we shouldn't
autoload on SHA-NI when the code using SHA-NI isn't being built. Sent out v2
with this fixed.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-01 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-29 5:15 [PATCH] crypto: x86/sha256 - autoload if SHA-NI detected Eric Biggers
2023-10-31 13:19 ` Roxana Nicolescu
2023-10-31 14:52 ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2023-11-01 3:22 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231101032202.GA1830@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roxana.nicolescu@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox